Welcome to our site! EDAboard.com is an international Electronics Discussion Forum focused on EDA software, circuits, schematics, books, theory, papers, asic, pld, 8051, DSP, Network, RF, Analog Design, PCB, Service Manuals... and a whole lot more! To participate you need to register. Registration is free. Click here to register now.
FM and PM are all the angle modulation in digital modulation,the relation is you can use the PHASE modulator to realize the FM modulation if you use an integrator to integrate the incoming source information,from the point of digital modulation,the phase modulation is the best,not the FM,for example,bpsk is more popular in DSS! this is a equalivent between the energe and bandwidth,and the difficulty of realization, for example, in GSM system ,it use the GMSK,its envelope is const ,or in otherwise,the PAR is almost one,so it is easy to desgin the power amplifier for GSM; but in CDMA system,if you use the BPSK,there are high requirement in the oscillator!
so if you want to know more about the FM and PM,i recommend you to read the reference book "analoge and digital commnuciation system" the author is the COUCH
Analog phase modulation, i think you need a coherent receiver while FM does not. IN digital mod, most of them are phase modulation (PSK, QPSK, DQPSK, QAM etc)
in fact ,if you use the diffierence code method,for example the DPSK,no need coherent demodulation,this is used in the wireless lan,such as STEL-2000chip use this method to demodulate the DPSK signal
FM Better? For what application. Find me a satellite that uses FM downlink! They all use qpsk, since you only need 1/2 the transmit power for a given data rate. You gotta love that coherent detection.
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.