Welcome to EDAboard.com

Welcome to our site! EDAboard.com is an international Electronic Discussion Forum focused on EDA software, circuits, schematics, books, theory, papers, asic, pld, 8051, DSP, Network, RF, Analog Design, PCB, Service Manuals... and a whole lot more! To participate you need to register. Registration is free. Click here to register now.

Register Log in

What software is typically used for Xilinx FPGA development?

Status
Not open for further replies.

Jayson

Full Member level 4
Joined
Oct 8, 2001
Messages
234
Helped
14
Reputation
28
Reaction score
5
Trophy points
1,298
Location
Brazil
Activity points
2,328
Can someone tell me what software programs in addition to ISE from Xilinx are used for FPGA development? and why? I keep hearing of Synopsys and Synplicity but have no idea what they do or if they're usefull and for what?

- Jayson
 

ramesh

Advanced Member level 1
Joined
Jan 19, 2003
Messages
424
Helped
14
Reputation
28
Reaction score
11
Trophy points
1,298
Activity points
2,947
Xilinx ISE is integrated Software environment. i.e. it has its own xilinx synthesis tool (XST) and then place and route tool. But simulation tool is from Modelsim ( third party).

Synopsys and Synplify are third party synthesis tools and have to be obtained separately if required. But now synopsys is no more supporting for FPGA synthesis.
Thats all I know!
 

Jayson

Full Member level 4
Joined
Oct 8, 2001
Messages
234
Helped
14
Reputation
28
Reaction score
5
Trophy points
1,298
Location
Brazil
Activity points
2,328
what is the advantage of using a third party synthesis tool?

- Jayson
 

ljkong

Full Member level 2
Joined
Jul 18, 2002
Messages
123
Helped
1
Reputation
2
Reaction score
0
Trophy points
1,296
Location
P.R.C
Activity points
763
you can develop all vendor's device.
compiling is more fast . synthesis is more fast. etc.
 

juripero

Member level 4
Joined
Jul 30, 2002
Messages
79
Helped
4
Reputation
8
Reaction score
1
Trophy points
1,288
Activity points
477
synplicity

synplicity is the most popular synthesis software for FPGA, it has better reputation compared with the synthesis software provided by FPGA providers.
 

linuxluo

Full Member level 6
Joined
Jul 26, 2002
Messages
331
Helped
7
Reputation
14
Reaction score
3
Trophy points
1,298
Activity points
2,514
Hi,
synplify can get result in shorter time , and fpga express can result in a high performance result .
And simulation tool the best is M@delsim, someone talk about debussy, but I have not used it.
 

aalbu

Member level 2
Joined
Dec 13, 2001
Messages
42
Helped
0
Reputation
0
Reaction score
0
Trophy points
1,286
Activity points
282
If you have big designs, with very difficult to achieve timing requirements, a very good and useful tool is Amplify.
 

ntxp

Member level 2
Joined
May 29, 2002
Messages
44
Helped
0
Reputation
0
Reaction score
0
Trophy points
1,286
Activity points
342
I use m0de5im + 5ynplIfy + 15E, buy a machine with more RAM, they are very hungry.
 

my_garden

Member level 4
Joined
Dec 14, 2001
Messages
79
Helped
0
Reputation
0
Reaction score
0
Trophy points
1,286
Activity points
666
I use spec*rum. I feel it work better than XST.
And for synplify is also one good tool. But some time it reduce the logic too much.
 

calvinhorng

Member level 4
Joined
Jul 18, 2002
Messages
73
Helped
0
Reputation
0
Reaction score
0
Trophy points
1,286
Activity points
539
I also use ISE Synplify(amplify) + Modelsim.

They work quite good.
 

calvinhorng

Member level 4
Joined
Jul 18, 2002
Messages
73
Helped
0
Reputation
0
Reaction score
0
Trophy points
1,286
Activity points
539
Does anyone out there use the HDL designer or Fpga advantage.

In the roadshow of Mentor last year,
I am impressed by their tool set.

But price is always a problem.
 

my_garden

Member level 4
Joined
Dec 14, 2001
Messages
79
Helped
0
Reputation
0
Reaction score
0
Trophy points
1,286
Activity points
666
i use men*or fpgav you can finish all the design process. And use spec*rum 's physical function and ise to map & par
It's very good tool
 

verilog

Member level 1
Joined
Jul 21, 2001
Messages
33
Helped
0
Reputation
0
Reaction score
0
Trophy points
1,286
Location
VN
Activity points
185
The third-party synthesis tools are almost better than fpga vendor's tools. I am using Spectr and Syn. They are so good in its duty. It can synthesize complex equations, complex designs.
 

DrBELL

Member level 2
Joined
Apr 30, 2002
Messages
52
Helped
0
Reputation
0
Reaction score
0
Trophy points
1,286
Activity points
351
Xilinx Design Tools

Xilinx ISE 5.1i Development tools comes with in-built synthesis tool
XST. You dont need Synplicity or Synopsys. In the older versions of
Xilinx Foundation Series there was no XST. So they used the third
party synthesis tools like Synopsys FPGA Express etc. Hope it clarifies


Thanks,
DrBELL
 

ramesh

Advanced Member level 1
Joined
Jan 19, 2003
Messages
424
Helped
14
Reputation
28
Reaction score
11
Trophy points
1,298
Activity points
2,947
Better than Synplify is Amplify. Amplify is a physical synthesis tool and it claims around 15% less logic usage compared to synplify. Hence amplify is costlier than synplify for logic saving in FPGA.
 

lipton

Member level 2
Joined
Jul 14, 2002
Messages
46
Helped
0
Reputation
0
Reaction score
0
Trophy points
1,286
Activity points
244
Aldec+Synplify+ISE Alliance - it doesn't get any better. Unless you can efford Amplify :D
 

snakebites

Junior Member level 2
Joined
Aug 14, 2002
Messages
23
Helped
0
Reputation
0
Reaction score
0
Trophy points
1,281
Location
CHINA
Activity points
99
If you have ambitious timing requrements,I think Amplify is better.
I use synplify(amplify)+ISE+modelsim
 

Aircraft Maniac

Member level 5
Joined
May 18, 2002
Messages
80
Helped
1
Reputation
2
Reaction score
1
Trophy points
1,288
Activity points
656
FPGA Development Tools

I think the best solution for FPGA development is to use

Amplify+ ModelSim + ISE 5.1i


I have recently started using them and I must say these three tools are an ultimate combination regarding logic reduction in FPGA (Amplify) and debugging the code and simulating it (ModelSim)






Aircraft Maniac
 

Maddin

Member level 5
Joined
Sep 26, 2001
Messages
94
Helped
0
Reputation
0
Reaction score
0
Trophy points
1,286
Location
Europe
Activity points
842
Hi,

I'm wondering that nobody is really happy with the results of XST. Why? Is it compilation time that is much longer or are the synthesis results (size) so bad compared to s.mpl.fy/ampl.fy?
Since I have no comparison between these tools (I'm still using XST since it is available at no extra costs in I$E5.1.), please let me/us know more about it.
Thanks,
Maddin
 

Status
Not open for further replies.
Toggle Sidebar

Part and Inventory Search

Welcome to EDABoard.com

Sponsor

Top