Continue to Site

Welcome to EDAboard.com

Welcome to our site! EDAboard.com is an international Electronics Discussion Forum focused on EDA software, circuits, schematics, books, theory, papers, asic, pld, 8051, DSP, Network, RF, Analog Design, PCB, Service Manuals... and a whole lot more! To participate you need to register. Registration is free. Click here to register now.

Why Virtual Short Concept in an Op-Amp is only applicable to negative feedback

newbie_hs

Advanced Member level 4
Full Member level 1
Joined
Mar 4, 2023
Messages
114
Helped
1
Reputation
2
Reaction score
1
Trophy points
18
Activity points
909
Dear Team,

I have a question which is haunting me for a long time.Till now I did not get any proper explanation.

If you can explain with mathematical proof it is appreciated.

The virtual short concept is only applied to op-amps in negative feedback configuration, and not in case of positive feedback.

Is there any plausible reason for this?


My expectation is that mathematical proof which explains why it is applicable to negative feedback and not applicable to positive feedback
 
Edaboard member LvW has posted a LTspice example many years ago. The positive feedback solution converged in case of an ideal OP with infinite bandwidth but failed with a real OP. Not sure if I can locate the old thread. The theoretical explanation is probably in the same direction. Input differential voltage is never zero for a real OP.
 
I don't recall that post, but I can simulate it with variable gain. With ideal Vio = 0 , Iin=0 and Rout=0, Rf=0 the error is purely a function of Vout not saturasted and Vdiff = 1/Ao , gain.

http://tinyurl.com/ytw6qqdd Now anyone can see the correlation. But typically 1e6 gain for BJT types but there is a wide range of choices and CMOS types tend to be much higher.

RIP RAP (Robert A. Pease. Inventor of the best Op Amp before uA 741 was even thought of and the bandgap reference diode and an icon of Silicon Valley in the 70's

WHAT'S ALL THIS STUFF ABOUT INPUT OFFSET, ANYHOW?.




1703610030549.png



and a thumbnail of my old boss who once looked like RAP long before this 2015 reunion of Unisys staff in Winnipg at the Peripherals factory for all of Unisys.. I was TE Mg with 10 ATE's raised floor office with 6x 1100 mainframes, 2 Liebert ACU's , 2 Liebert pwr conditioners and 50 1" dual port SCSI cables to the test floor. with hundreds of minicomputers, Apple ]['s and custom testers.
--- Updated ---

for 9 sigfigs (rediculous but for the detail oriented folks)

 

Attachments

  • 1703610030586.png
    1703610030586.png
    463.1 KB · Views: 87
Last edited:
I'm not completely sure if the original question is adressing the same problem, here's the mentioned old thread, instructive in any case:
 
Keep in mind the virtual null ONLY exists in linear operation, because when the output is saturated, the LOOP GAIN is ZERO.

Remember Vin+-Vin-= Vo/Ao.

+ve feedback relaxation oscillator work this way, without a virtual null, yet have enough -ve feedback to toggle the output .with RC delays..
 
Last edited:

LaTeX Commands Quick-Menu:

Similar threads

Part and Inventory Search

Welcome to EDABoard.com

Sponsor

Back
Top