want to below component details

[rahul32]

hello friends.....

i have 1 component..& i don't know what is the part no. of it......
SMD code on this component is C2K C13....& it's package is SOT89
it has 3 pins.....& also attached Image file...
if possible then send me the link of datasheet.......
it is used in transducer.......

thank u.....

 

[kripacharya]

My guess is that its an LDO regulator chip. I don't know where you got the C2K, C13 notation from - i don't see that anywhere.

The two caps are also connected the way you would expect for an regulator ic.

 

[yassin.kraouch]

i guesss its a linear regulator, https://www.richtek.com/download_ds.jsp?s=231

 

[kripacharya]

i guesss its a linear regulator, https://www.richtek.com/download_ds.jsp?s=231

Yassin, Why do you think it's THIS particular reg ??

 

[yassin.kraouch]

see the link below, you can know the component based on the marking on it
https://www.s-manuals.com/smd

 

[kripacharya]

see the link below, you can know the component based on the marking on it
https://www.s-manuals.com/smd

yea yea yea... we all have this link.

Where did you get THAT specific component ? Explain better, or don't post.

thanks

 

[yassin.kraouch]

based on the information you give, annd the marking, you have to learn how to use this table, not to say to other don't post

 

[godfreyl]

I'm a little lost here. Looking up "F9" in that table, I see TC1073 and RT9011 LDOs, but not the RT9161 that you linked. Am I missing something?

 

[yassin.kraouch]

I'm a little lost here. Looking up "F9" in that table, I see TC1073 and RT9011 LDOs, but not the RT9161 that you linked. Am I missing something?

he said ( not me ) that the marking on the component is C13, so you go directly to C1 column, and you will find SOT 89 component, and it is a regulator,
https://www.s-manuals.com/smd/c1

 

[rahul32]

i have the same component of SOT-89 Package...but it's smd code on it is NOT F9.......but the code on it is C2k, C13......the component shown in the image is only sample, plz consider the code as C2K, C13......i want the part no of this code (C2K, C13)..

 

[ark5230]

Difference between the real component and sample component description created lot of confusion. Had the post #2 been properly replied by Rahul32, things would have been simple.

 

[rahul32]

plz consider the code is c2k.................it's not f9...the image is only sample.....i have same component; same package....but it's not f9.....it is c2k........dn't serch f9 code component.........want to c2k code component detail....