Welcome to EDAboard.com

Welcome to our site! EDAboard.com is an international Electronics Discussion Forum focused on EDA software, circuits, schematics, books, theory, papers, asic, pld, 8051, DSP, Network, RF, Analog Design, PCB, Service Manuals... and a whole lot more! To participate you need to register. Registration is free. Click here to register now.

?: S-parameters and Characteristic Impedance

Status
Not open for further replies.

saryee

Member level 2
Joined
Sep 4, 2003
Messages
53
Helped
0
Reputation
0
Reaction score
0
Trophy points
1,286
Activity points
469
Hello, there,

If the S-parameters of a two-port device are known, can the characteristic impedance be calculated? And how?

BR,

saryee
 

flatulent

Advanced Member level 5
Joined
Jul 19, 2002
Messages
4,629
Helped
489
Reputation
980
Reaction score
150
Trophy points
1,343
Location
Middle Earth
Activity points
46,689
yes

There are standard equations to convert between all of the two port parameter sets.

What do you mean by characteristic impedance?
 

eltonjohn

Advanced Member level 4
Joined
Feb 22, 2002
Messages
1,435
Helped
64
Reputation
126
Reaction score
28
Trophy points
1,328
Activity points
16,326
I THINK HE IS THINKING ABOUT .......

IT SEEMS THAT HE IS TALKING OF A TRANSMISSION LINE!
 

maxwell2002

Junior Member level 1
Joined
Jun 14, 2002
Messages
16
Helped
0
Reputation
0
Reaction score
0
Trophy points
1,281
Activity points
51
I don't think that you could get Zc's, for given S-MAT.
 

Nuj_am

Newbie level 1
Joined
Sep 9, 2003
Messages
1
Helped
0
Reputation
0
Reaction score
0
Trophy points
1,281
Activity points
8
I guess it con not be caculate,Zc is also influenced by the other parameters,u must need lots of others to caculate.
 

mImoto

Full Member level 4
Joined
Feb 21, 2002
Messages
211
Helped
4
Reputation
8
Reaction score
1
Trophy points
1,298
Activity points
1,746
Hello,

You need to know rs or rl (reflexion coeficient at source or load)

rin=S11 + s12.s21.rl/(1-s22.rl)=(Zin-Zo)/(Zin + Zo)
rout=S22+s12.s21.rs/(1-s11.rs)=....

knowing the S parameters and rs or rl then you know rin or rout and with the formula of the reflexion coeficient you get Zo. Check Pozar book.

but I remenber that it is not so easy in the real life to get the Zo (you need rs or rl).

Best regards,

mimoto
 

BigBoss

Advanced Member level 5
Joined
Nov 17, 2001
Messages
5,112
Helped
1,529
Reputation
3,056
Reaction score
1,376
Trophy points
1,393
Location
Turkey
Activity points
30,743
What a strange question ?? :?

If the S-matrix is well defined , how the Zo is not defined ?
Zo is the characteristic impedance of the measurement system. It can be 50 Ohm or 75 Ohm smt..

By definition of S parameters , a Zo must be defined to measure or simulate them..

unlogical question , nonsense.. :sm31:
 

maxwell2002

Junior Member level 1
Joined
Jun 14, 2002
Messages
16
Helped
0
Reputation
0
Reaction score
0
Trophy points
1,281
Activity points
51
BigBoss is absolutely right. I agree with you.
 

nickwang

Junior Member level 1
Joined
Sep 4, 2003
Messages
15
Helped
0
Reputation
0
Reaction score
0
Trophy points
1,281
Activity points
182
I agree with mImoto.
You could normally get S parameters but not
Zo, with network analyzer.
and with all S parameters available, you can
calculate Zo
 

saryee

Member level 2
Joined
Sep 4, 2003
Messages
53
Helped
0
Reputation
0
Reaction score
0
Trophy points
1,286
Activity points
469
There are standard equations to convert between all of the two port parameter sets.

What do you mean by characteristic impedance?

-- I don't mean to calculate the Z-parameters.

IT SEEMS THAT HE IS TALKING OF A TRANSMISSION LINE!

-- Yes.

I guess it con not be caculate,Zc is also influenced by the other parameters,u must need lots of others to caculate.

-- But after the physical dimensions of the TxL are determinded, I think, the characteristic impedance should be constant at a certain frequence.

Check Pozar book.
-- Which one?

Any way, thank you all. I'm just a newbie. Thanks for you help.
 

Mazz

Advanced Member level 2
Joined
Nov 3, 2001
Messages
676
Helped
131
Reputation
262
Reaction score
50
Trophy points
1,308
Activity points
5,463
My idea of the question is:
saryee KNOWS that the Sparameter set represents a transmission line, and he wants to know what is the char imp of this line.

theorically the answer is simple, it's just to do a small mathematic.
Or, using a simulator, U can optimize Z0, attenuation and electrical length of an ideal transmission line in order to have the same S-parameter.

Bye
Mazz
 

Andryuha

Member level 4
Joined
Oct 21, 2005
Messages
78
Helped
6
Reputation
12
Reaction score
6
Trophy points
1,288
Activity points
1,893
Oh my ***!
People!?
Don't you see the difference between the Zo of the measurement system, including Analyzer ports and cables and the Zc of the DUT?
Zo is usually impedance of normalization (reference), that is suggested to be impedance of ports and cables. So, 50Ohm (or 75, if you are into television)
Zc is the impedance of the *PASSIVE* DUT (2-port transmission line of the Unknown property)
Therefore, from the DUT point of view, Zo is a LOAD, not a characteristic impedance.

S-parameters&2 Loads are complete system. As well as ABCD parameters.

When you are calibrating your analyzer - you EXCLUDE ports and cables from equations by default. You don't need to know them - only the port impedance is enough.

Now, using normalization, you can convert S&Load->ABCD and *ESTIMATE* U/I form ABCD as SQRT(B/C)

The problem is, the load impedance is not always Real. So, you can only guess, is it 50Ohm, or X+jY, where X just MAY be something close to 48+- Ohm.

Use V.F.Fusco book, it is simpler.

And use passive calibrations kits! Calibrate with THRU of the same electrical length as both connectors.
Clean the kit with tools and alcohol before use. Automatic calibrators are useless for such kind of things, the phase error is horrible.
This works even in HFSS, but you must disable port renormalization, simulate 50Ohm input and output connector-structures alone and extract them from ABCD first (ABCDport^-1 x ABCD x ABCDport^-1).
Simple equation can be used on well calibrated Agilent PNAs in REAL TIME (unfortunately, with bad precision)
This doesn't work well on ferrite phase shifters because the phase shift could be >100pi and the errors are considerable. SQRT(B/C) also doesn't work here well, see Collin.

I've seen, there are more precise ways of extracting the impedance basing on knowledge of reciprocal matrices. I just didn't figure them out. One guy was reciprocally fixing symmetry in matrices before excluding port's ABCD^-1, so impedance was smooth and precise in the 2-20Gh band without waves with all singularities.

So, if you have an Idea how to make it more precise, please share the method here.
 
Last edited:

Status
Not open for further replies.

Part and Inventory Search

Welcome to EDABoard.com

Sponsor

Top