p.sivakuamr
Newbie level 3

Hi
this siva,Now i am designing comparator as a receiver.Generally we are giving two inputs ,one is vo+ and other is vo- for that we are setting both Pmos transistors(input level) Width of cmparator is same for zero hysteresis.In my designing one input is pulse wave form(1to3.3v)and other input is fixed to maintain the Hysteresis (165mv).You can see the My comparator circuit in jacob Baker(pag no 689).
Is need to set the pmos transistors widths are same ?
if it is yes can u tell me the reason ?
In my design we are using different level of inputs,so can i set different widths for pmos transistors to get the rail to rail o/p with 165mv hysteresis ?
Actually i designed with same widths of pmos transistors for that i got one o/p was rail to rail swing but other one (which is less compared to other input) i got lower swing(not rail to rail) with less hysteresis. thatswhy i am asking above questions
regards
siva
this siva,Now i am designing comparator as a receiver.Generally we are giving two inputs ,one is vo+ and other is vo- for that we are setting both Pmos transistors(input level) Width of cmparator is same for zero hysteresis.In my designing one input is pulse wave form(1to3.3v)and other input is fixed to maintain the Hysteresis (165mv).You can see the My comparator circuit in jacob Baker(pag no 689).
Is need to set the pmos transistors widths are same ?
if it is yes can u tell me the reason ?
In my design we are using different level of inputs,so can i set different widths for pmos transistors to get the rail to rail o/p with 165mv hysteresis ?
Actually i designed with same widths of pmos transistors for that i got one o/p was rail to rail swing but other one (which is less compared to other input) i got lower swing(not rail to rail) with less hysteresis. thatswhy i am asking above questions
regards
siva