Continue to Site

Welcome to EDAboard.com

Welcome to our site! EDAboard.com is an international Electronics Discussion Forum focused on EDA software, circuits, schematics, books, theory, papers, asic, pld, 8051, DSP, Network, RF, Analog Design, PCB, Service Manuals... and a whole lot more! To participate you need to register. Registration is free. Click here to register now.

Question about crosstalk optimization in Celtic

Status
Not open for further replies.

energeticdin

Full Member level 2
Joined
Jul 31, 2006
Messages
125
Helped
6
Reputation
12
Reaction score
1
Trophy points
1,298
Activity points
2,156
Before crosstalk:

../u_2__per_round/u0__key | B v -> Y ^ | NOR2X8 | 0.116 | 1.587 | 1.506 |

After Crosstalk:

../u_2__per_round/u0_key | B v -> Y ^ | NOR2X8 | 0.116 | 1.587 | 1.513 |
| scheduler/U461

After Crosstalk Optimization:

../u_2__per_round/u0__key | B v -> Y ^ | NOR2X8 | 0.101 | 1.572 | 1.552 |
| scheduler/U461

In this NOR2X8 cell, after doing crosstalk optimization. how the delay is decreasing?
What is happening in Optimization?
I know the delay value is picking based on input transition time and output load capacitance from libraries.
 

Re: Celtic- optimization

Hi,
delay due to crosstalk effect can be reduced by upsizing the cell or applying non default rules likw(double spacing) on net metal routes or shilding.
So you can check what it is doing by inspecting both before and after optimizations.
 

Celtic- optimization

from the given details, ur total dealy before and ater delay is same and increased after cross talk optimizations,, is that correct,
If i understood correctly,, can u elaborate ur question,
Please correct me if i understood wrongly
 

Status
Not open for further replies.

Part and Inventory Search

Welcome to EDABoard.com

Sponsor

Back
Top