Continue to Site

Welcome to EDAboard.com

Welcome to our site! EDAboard.com is an international Electronics Discussion Forum focused on EDA software, circuits, schematics, books, theory, papers, asic, pld, 8051, DSP, Network, RF, Analog Design, PCB, Service Manuals... and a whole lot more! To participate you need to register. Registration is free. Click here to register now.

Problems in extracting coupling coefficient (or Qe) curve

Status
Not open for further replies.

tucheng

Newbie level 6
Joined
Jan 4, 2010
Messages
13
Helped
0
Reputation
0
Reaction score
0
Trophy points
1,281
Location
China
Activity points
1,367
I am designing a five-orders mirostrip combline filter on a 1.27mm thick substrate with a relative dielectric constant of 10.8. I let the microstrip resonators be lambda/4 long and require no capacitive loading for this filter design. There is a metal vias to ground at the end of each resonator.
Step 1: extract coupling coefficient between two resonators
The model was established in HFSS11.0. As can be seen below, a pair of resonators is loosely coupled by the open-circuit transmission line. Then the simulation result shows double peak response as expected. But when I increased the gap distance between the two resonators, double peaks both shift to low side, which means the center frequenc decreased. I thought these two peaks would shift in opposite direction and the center frequency keep unchanged. Is my original idea wrong? If I am right, can anyone tell me why center frequency shifts as coupling between the two resonators decrease?

Step 2: extract external Q
The model and the simulation result can be seen below. The same problem happened as step 1. Center frequency( where the phase of S11 changes most dramatically) shifts as tapped point varies!

Please help. Thank you in advance!
 

Lately, I was told that the extracted coupling coefficient and Qe using this approach would not be accurate. But no one around me kowns why! Is it the problem of HFSS?
 

I think a better method is to use the reflected group delay.
See the link about filter couplings on this page which is an article from Applied Microwaves and Wireless (May 1999)
**broken link removed**

Filters can be generally time consuming to fully calculate and optimise using full 3D solvers like CST/MWS and HFSS. You can get very close, very quickly, using circuit simulators like ADS and MWO.

Then HFSS or MWS can be used for the final small adjustments.
 

Re: Problems in extracting coupling coefficient (or Qe) curv

PeterMartin said:
I think a better method is to use the reflected group delay.
See the link about filter couplings on this page which is an article from Applied Microwaves and Wireless (May 1999)
**broken link removed**

Filters can be generally time consuming to fully calculate and optimise using full 3D solvers like CST/MWS and HFSS. You can get very close, very quickly, using circuit simulators like ADS and MWO.

Then HFSS or MWS can be used for the final small adjustments.

Hi PeterMartin:
Thank you for your suggestion. I do think it is a more effective way to use circuit simulators at first. But maybe you misunderstood what I mean. I just doubted the validity of my steps to extract coupling coefficient (or Qe) curve using HFSS, and I also had met a problem of frequency shift when using this method which confused me.
 

Re: Problems in extracting coupling coefficient (or Qe) curv

Hi dear friend ,
I'm trying to simulate coupling between two combline resonators.
but I dont know how to do this by using HFSS10 and extract coupling diagrams via eigen mode solver of HFSS.
can u help me please?
regards
 

Status
Not open for further replies.

Part and Inventory Search

Welcome to EDABoard.com

Sponsor

Back
Top