Welcome to EDAboard.com

Welcome to our site! EDAboard.com is an international Electronic Discussion Forum focused on EDA software, circuits, schematics, books, theory, papers, asic, pld, 8051, DSP, Network, RF, Analog Design, PCB, Service Manuals... and a whole lot more! To participate you need to register. Registration is free. Click here to register now.

Register Log in

Problem of impedance matching of Gilbert cell mixer

sqx

Member level 1
Joined
Sep 21, 2018
Messages
34
Helped
1
Reputation
2
Reaction score
1
Trophy points
8
Activity points
347
Screenshot from 2019-12-02 20-22-13.png

Hi,

For a typical double balanced Gilbert cell, how to match the RF input to 100 ohm?

The zero frequency input impedance should be infinity. Even when frequency increases, the input impedance doesn't change significantly at sub-6GHz range.

I understand that inductive degeneration can help with input-matching, but sometimes we need very large value to make the real part 50 or 100 ohm, which might not be realizable.

Since the input impedance is very large, can I directly add a parallel 100 ohm resistor at the input? In my simulation, noise figure doesn't seem to sacrifice a lot. So can I do it?
 

frankrose

Advanced Member level 3
Joined
Nov 27, 2013
Messages
772
Helped
216
Reputation
432
Reaction score
210
Trophy points
43
Activity points
5,369
Firstly, is it integrated or not? Integrated mixer's input is connected to a low noise amplifier (LNA) usually, matching between them is not necessary until the frequency is not too high and distance is low between them. Even with discrete devices this statement can be valid. Share more details, specifications what you want.
 

Anomis

Junior Member level 2
Joined
Mar 11, 2017
Messages
20
Helped
5
Reputation
10
Reaction score
4
Trophy points
3
Location
South Korea
Activity points
194
View attachment 156744

Hi,

For a typical double balanced Gilbert cell, how to match the RF input to 100 ohm?

The zero frequency input impedance should be infinity. Even when frequency increases, the input impedance doesn't change significantly at sub-6GHz range.

I understand that inductive degeneration can help with input-matching, but sometimes we need very large value to make the real part 50 or 100 ohm, which might not be realizable.

Since the input impedance is very large, can I directly add a parallel 100 ohm resistor at the input? In my simulation, noise figure doesn't seem to sacrifice a lot. So can I do it?
I think you had better show your input impedance to examine whether or not your process is possible of doing input matching.
Because any BJT has a rpi in parallel with Ccb hence we are possibly able to do matching with L-C fundamental structure. If inductors or capacitors are enormous challengingly to implement on-chip, you r supposed to employ Transmission line or off chip components instead.
In case of putting a 100 Ohm at base of RF input device, 100 Ohm here gets the NF significantly soar to the bad figure so i think it is not a wise choice for matching stuff at least in my design experience.
Have fun !
 

Toggle Sidebar

Part and Inventory Search

Welcome to EDABoard.com

Sponsor

Top