The IRF840 Vishay worst case body diode is 2V max for threshold at 8A.
The UF4007 max is 1.7V at 1 A.
So its questionable if the UF4007 is dominant. But it is fast for sure at 75 nS at 1A.
You could set up a quick bench jig to test the presence and absence of the UF4007
by turnoff off L load on just one MOSFET switching the L load. To see what impact it
actually has. But better diode selection I would think is in order. Note this is a bit
of a crapshoot as body diodes are so poorly speced in datasheets to get a handle
on device to device variation.
Regards, Dana.
--- Updated ---
Yes on turnoff question.
Burnup when supply plugs in, sure sounds like a power sequencing issue in play here.
You could use a f() gen with ramp and a power pass transistor to ramp supply, and do
a scope capture triggered by say 2V to get an idea of whats going on in circuit. Scope
should have a deep enough memory to do it, depending on sampling rate you choose.
Regards, Dana.
Ok, i will try the circuit with a bulb series with supply and removing filter from the output (only a resistor attached or nothing at all)Hi,
Both diodes should be fast at turn ON. This is not the problem.
The problem is turn OFF.
Reverse recovery time is...
Let´s assume there is reverse current through the MOSFET, thus the body diode becomes conductive.
But the problem is: it stays conductive for a short time even when voltage is reversed.
For a single low side or high side MOSFET this is not the problem, the dides usually never become conductive.
But in a half bridge...(example: Low side PWM while HIGH side is always OFF)
* let´s assume the LOW side is ON.
* then Low side is switched OFF
* due to some load side inductance the HIGH side MOSFET´s body diode becomes conductive
* if you now switch ON the LOW side MOSFET again, then you have the situation that the high side body diode stays conductive while the low side MOSFET is conductive too. --> very high current peak for a short time until the high side body diode releases.
(+supply --> high side diode (reverse) --> low side MOSFET --> GND)
Klaus
Are you sure it is no measurement problem? How did you measure it?can you guys explain why Vgs of high side drops after connecting even a low voltage supply?
couple of hours ago I've attached two picture of Vgs on oscilloscope before and after connecting mosfets supply.Hi
Are you sure it is no measurement problem? How did you measure it?
Check your 12V supply.
Btw: with the 12V supply I miss at least one bulk capacitor and 1 fast ceramics capacitor for each IC.
Klaus
here is the new schematic.Hi,
No capacitor is shown in 12V node in your schematic. Please update your schenatic.
You gave no information about measurement method .. nor 12V voltage (scope) , or eventual junction problems..
Klaus
This nodes move 300V up and is not isolated from mains voltage, thys you can't use a usual scope and a usual scope probe.what do you mean by measurement method?
Both Trr and Ton are problem issues in todays SMPS -Hi,
Both diodes should be fast at turn ON. This is not the problem.
The problem is turn OFF.
Reverse recovery time is...
Let´s assume there is reverse current through the MOSFET, thus the body diode becomes conductive.
But the problem is: it stays conductive for a short time even when voltage is reversed.
For a single low side or high side MOSFET this is not the problem, the dides usually never become conductive.
But in a half bridge...(example: Low side PWM while HIGH side is always OFF)
* let´s assume the LOW side is ON.
* then Low side is switched OFF
* due to some load side inductance the HIGH side MOSFET´s body diode becomes conductive
* if you now switch ON the LOW side MOSFET again, then you have the situation that the high side body diode stays conductive while the low side MOSFET is conductive too. --> very high current peak for a short time until the high side body diode releases.
(+supply --> high side diode (reverse) --> low side MOSFET --> GND)
Klaus
the Vgs that i posted is at 24 V supply, so no problem.Hi,
This nodes move 300V up and is not isolated from mains voltage, thys you can't use a usual scope and a usual scope probe.
Thus I ask how you measured it.
Klaus
i really dont think that diodes are the problem. cause i use 2ms dead time.Probing - https://download.tek.com/document/55W_18412_9.pdf
Regards, Dana.
--- Updated ---
Both Trr and Ton are problem issues in todays SMPS -
Diode Turn-On Time Induced Failures in Switching Regulators | Analog Devices
IntroductionMost circuit designers are familiar with diode dynamiccharacteristics such as charge storage, voltage dependentcapacitance and reverse recovery time. Less commonlyacknowledged and manufacturer specifi ed is diode forwardturn-on time. This parameter describes the timerequired for a...www.analog.com
Covers turn on issue as well.
Regards, Dana.
--- Updated ---
Deeper explanation of Trr effects of body diode -
View attachment 171102
Regards, Dana.
You don´t do yourself a favour by giving vage informations.you can't use a usual scope and a usual scope probe.
Thus I ask how you measured it.
either i dont understand what do you mean or you dont understand what im saying.Hi,
You don´t do yourself a favour by giving vage informations.
But I don´t want to bother you by asking the same .. a third time...
Klaus
If the diode current caused by the load or stray inductance lasts longer than 2ms (which is rather likely with motor as load or filter inductance) then even 2ms dead time is not enough.i really dont think that diodes are the problem. cause i use 2ms dead time.
Deadtime calculation -the Vgs that i posted is at 24 V supply, so no problem.
but i measured 310 V dc with my scope before. i put the probe scale button on 10x and it worked fine.
--- Updated ---
i really dont think that diodes are the problem. cause i use 2ms dead time.
im using gps-1102b (i think its channels are isolated from each other, not sure about isolation from ground).Hi,
* What exact scope are you using (especially inputs isolatated against earth GND?)
* What exact probes are you using
* Where exactly did you connect both probe connections. (PCB layout, photo..)
* Do you use any isolation transformer, if yes, where/how?
If the diode current caused by the load or stray inductance lasts longer than 2ms (which is rather likely with motor as load or filter inductance) then even 2ms dead time is not enough.
In your case a 1A MOSFET current (= L1, L2 current) on a 2V voltage drop (diode + wiring + Ls) will keep current running for 5ms. More current --> more time.
Dead time is (in most cases) to avoid mosfet - mosfet cross conduction (not diode - mosfet)
Klaus
It takes 10 seconds to find the user manual.im using gps-1102b (i think its channels are isolated from each other, not sure about isolation from ground).
No. This has nothing to do with electrical or safety isolation!Your scope has iso between channels, but shares a common ground amongst the channels.
Thats correct, the safety issue is a ground problem as prior discussed in ap note from tek posted.Hi,
It takes 10 seconds to find the user manual.
It says:
Connect the Signal Wire Correctly
The potential of the signal wire is equal to the earth, so do not connect the signal
wire to a high voltage. Do not touch the exposed contacts or components.
So neither the channels are isolated for each other nor isolated form EARTH.
Be happy that nothing exploded and nothing burned so far.
*****
The PCB layout is not suitable for a switch mode supply.
Every critical path is to high impedance, mainly because of missing a good return path (GND plane).
* Missing 310V supply capacitors next to the MOSFETs
* fast ceramics capacitors need to be as close as possible to the IC´s supply pins. Bulk capacitors may be more far away (it´s the other way round on your PCB)
****
I strongly recommend
* to read scope manual,
* safety regulations
* application notes on how to design an SMPS PCB. (every SMPS IC manufacturer provides them. They have good reason for this! There also are thousands of discussions and example circuits in the internet, even videos)
Maybe you find it a waste of time, maybe you are in hurry ... but I still recommend to do first steps first.
It may need some time, but then you are able to create reliable designs.
Your design may work some hours, maybe some days, but I doubt it can reliably work for weeks.
Klaus
--- Updated ---
Hi,
No. This has nothing to do with electrical or safety isolation!
This is just channel to channel "crosstalk".
Klaus
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?