Continue to Site

Welcome to EDAboard.com

Welcome to our site! EDAboard.com is an international Electronics Discussion Forum focused on EDA software, circuits, schematics, books, theory, papers, asic, pld, 8051, DSP, Network, RF, Analog Design, PCB, Service Manuals... and a whole lot more! To participate you need to register. Registration is free. Click here to register now.

Linear electro optic effect in a non linear material

Status
Not open for further replies.

atyra90

Newbie level 4
Newbie level 4
Joined
May 31, 2013
Messages
5
Helped
0
Reputation
0
Reaction score
0
Trophy points
1,281
Visit site
Activity points
1,322
hi,
Help me to understand is there any relation between Linear electro optic coefficient (rij Pockel's coefficient) & χ2 (chi2) coefficient for a second order non-linear materials? Are they same or physically completely different?

In linear electro-optic effect (Pockel's effect) the change in refractive index is directly proportional to the applied DC or low frequency Electric field, and when an optical wave travel through medium it will a see a completely different medium as compared to when there is no field. and
Δn = c r E ........... (i)
where Δn is change in r.i. n "r" is an electro optic coefficient & E is applied DC electric field

For a material to show pockel's effect should not posses any inversion symmetry (non centrosymmetric). i.e. Lithium Niobate. which is basically a non linear material & have second order non linear coefficient (chi2).

The polarization of a non linear material in the presence of an E-field can be written as
P = ε0 χ1 E + ε0 χ2 EE + ε0 χ3 EEE+.....
P = ε0(χ1 + χ2 E + χ3 EE+...................)E

where χ1 , χ2 and χ3 are linear susceptibility, second order non linear susceptibility and third order non linear susceptibility respectively. If we consider only χ1 and χ2 and leaving the other higher order term then Polarization is P = ε0(χ1 + χ2 E)E

Now the relative permittivity of the medium can be given as εr(E) = 1 + χ1 + χ2 E
since 1 + χ1 = εr (original relative permittivity when there was no field)
thus Δεr = εr(E) - εr
Δεr = χ2 E

since Δεr = 2nΔn from εr = n² , therefore Δn = (χ2/2n) E..........(ii)
Thus, change in r.i. is directly proportional to the applied electric field.

Are eq(i) & eq(ii) are both physically same?

Thank you
 

Status
Not open for further replies.

Similar threads

Part and Inventory Search

Welcome to EDABoard.com

Sponsor

Back
Top