Continue to Site

Welcome to EDAboard.com

Welcome to our site! EDAboard.com is an international Electronics Discussion Forum focused on EDA software, circuits, schematics, books, theory, papers, asic, pld, 8051, DSP, Network, RF, Analog Design, PCB, Service Manuals... and a whole lot more! To participate you need to register. Registration is free. Click here to register now.

Let's talk about this pll design

Status
Not open for further replies.

xihuwang

Member level 2
Joined
Oct 23, 2007
Messages
46
Helped
1
Reputation
2
Reaction score
1
Trophy points
1,288
Activity points
1,595
Hi:
A PLL design has big peak to peak jitter.
The designer thinks :
1. The defect of input and output buffer ( ref to pic 1 below, when the
reference frequency is 100MHz, the test result of the peak to peak
jitter of Fref is 680ps)
2. The process variation of the capacitor in loop filter for 90nm
maybe be the reason of large jitter of the pll design .

My questions are :
1. Why and How the defect of buffer can result in the large jitter, and how
to resove the problem( Or how to design the buffer to decrease the jitter)
2. The designer think the other reason lies in the variaton of the filter cap.
But I think maybe the resistor value's variation maybe the reason.
The design use switch cap ckt to work as the resistor in the LPF.
So my question is wheather switch cap resistor can work properly
in PLL. Have you used this kind of SC resistor to decrease chip area?
This question is important for me for it is important for me to find out
a way to implement the resistor instead of physical resistor ( the
target process's sheet resistor is too small)

Thanks forward !

 

1. The input buffer typically converts sine wave in to square wave., which requires large gain and has a considerable ISF. So it can add a lot of noise. The output buffer has to drive huge loads and it is quite sensitive to supply noise.
2. The process variation of capacitor could not be the cause of high jitter. Firstly it cant change in short time, Secondly the change of value should have altered the BW by only a small amount., this cant show up as a huge jitter as there is no sharp optimum (Cap change would be nothing compared to KVCO change with process, temperature and frequency).
3. In practical case the fact that you have replaced an actual resistor with a switched cap could bring in a lot of jitter.
 

Status
Not open for further replies.

Similar threads

Part and Inventory Search

Welcome to EDABoard.com

Sponsor

Back
Top