Welcome to our site! EDAboard.com is an international Electronics Discussion Forum focused on EDA software, circuits, schematics, books, theory, papers, asic, pld, 8051, DSP, Network, RF, Analog Design, PCB, Service Manuals... and a whole lot more! To participate you need to register. Registration is free. Click here to register now.
I've tried this type of lump port but I obtained bad result which was different from paper's result. I've used waveport to excite this structure and I obtained a good result like paper's result. So I don't know why these results are much different. Have u tried to simulate my HFSS's file attached above use lumport?
Thanks for your response. But I still don't understand clearly about your model. Could you tell me about dimension of your feeding structure? And I have just tried to use your feeding structure like yours in my model, it got a bad result . Why don't you help me to try exciting lump port at my model?
we have a link between 2 ground and i connected the feed between this link and main line its the best method for CPW and 100% it will work i have no free time to change your model and may be your design is not true
I have obtained the good result when I excited by wave port. I only confuse why the results obtained by wave port and lump port are different . By the way, could you explain for me why did u choose boundary condition in your model are finite conductivity not PEC?
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.