Welcome to EDAboard.com

Welcome to our site! EDAboard.com is an international Electronic Discussion Forum focused on EDA software, circuits, schematics, books, theory, papers, asic, pld, 8051, DSP, Network, RF, Analog Design, PCB, Service Manuals... and a whole lot more! To participate you need to register. Registration is free. Click here to register now.

Register Log in

Calculate frequenzy - modified astable

Status
Not open for further replies.

Prototyp_V1.0

Advanced Member level 2
Joined
Apr 3, 2007
Messages
661
Helped
119
Reputation
238
Reaction score
81
Trophy points
1,308
Location
Norway
Activity points
4,856
Hi. Is there some in here capable to find any expression for the frequenzy of an modified version of an astable multivibrator.

I ask this because I found out that Vbe without diodes can reach a negative voltage that is almost the same value as voltage supply. That means if voltage supply is 12 volts, the npn bjt's probably won't last.

I have tried this amv on a breadboard, and it works the same way as original circuit. It oscilates faster than original circuit.

Anyone has an idea how to find expression for the frequenzy?
 

Audioguru

Advanced Member level 5
Joined
Jan 19, 2008
Messages
9,112
Helped
2,115
Reputation
4,224
Reaction score
1,939
Trophy points
1,393
Location
Toronto area of Canada
Activity points
57,244
Connect the diodes in series with the emitters of the transistors to allow the oscillator to work but block the reverse voltage from causing avalanche breakdown of the emitter-base junctions of the transistors.
 

FvM

Super Moderator
Staff member
Joined
Jan 22, 2008
Messages
47,871
Helped
14,125
Reputation
28,507
Reaction score
12,808
Trophy points
1,393
Location
Bochum, Germany
Activity points
277,832
In both cases, the frequency is defined by the timing of capacitor discharge, the initial condition is different, however. You can derive the frequency "formula" by putting in the initial and final condition of the exponential discharge process.

The original expression is simplified, without considering Vbe, finite current gain, saturation voltage. It's simply
Code:
2*(-ln(0.5)) = 1.38
With the diodes, at least Vbe, Vd and also Vcc get relevant. As a rough estimation (assuming Vbe = Vd = 0.6)
Code:
2*(-ln(11.4/12.6)) = 0.2
 

Prototyp_V1.0

Advanced Member level 2
Joined
Apr 3, 2007
Messages
661
Helped
119
Reputation
238
Reaction score
81
Trophy points
1,308
Location
Norway
Activity points
4,856
Thanks both of you. I didn't think of putting diodes in series with emitter :)
Then again I guess the frequenzy would be different from the result using the original formula.

@FvM
I'm not sure I really got the hang on the calculation, but it sure must be lower than 1.38 because test shows that frequenzy goes up when using diodes in parallell such as I did.
 

Status
Not open for further replies.

Part and Inventory Search

Welcome to EDABoard.com

Sponsor

Top