Continue to Site

Welcome to EDAboard.com

Welcome to our site! EDAboard.com is an international Electronics Discussion Forum focused on EDA software, circuits, schematics, books, theory, papers, asic, pld, 8051, DSP, Network, RF, Analog Design, PCB, Service Manuals... and a whole lot more! To participate you need to register. Registration is free. Click here to register now.

About semiconductors

Status
Not open for further replies.

Deepthi Palavelli

Newbie level 4
Newbie level 4
Joined
Aug 18, 2013
Messages
5
Helped
0
Reputation
0
Reaction score
0
Trophy points
1
Visit site
Activity points
32
why we use only si & ge..instead of carbon (because it also have 4 valence electrons..)?
IS there any other semi conductors except si and ge?
 

IS there any other semi conductors except si and ge?
There are a few others, such as Gallium Arsenide and Silicon Carbide.

Good guess. Diamond looks very promising. See here and here.

- - - Updated - - -

Sorry, the answer given there is complete nonsense.
 

Many materials systems in IV, III-V, II-VI each with their
own strengths and problems.

Silicon wins on cost and for almost anything sold to the
consumer, cost is first and second.

Diamond is not exactly affordable in single crystal, high
purity, large diameter wafers. In fact you can not have
a 6", 8", 12" (that's 150, 200, 300mm for all you modern
types) wafer of single crystal diamond, nor one with a
semiconductor grade single crystal epi layer, at any
price.

And if you could have one, you would find it very difficult
to do the basics - ohmic contacts I think have only been
demonstrated using exotic metals, implants can't be
activated because the crystal is -too- strong to substitute
them, there is no native oxide, etc.

SiGe is just Si with a dollop of secret sauce. It's advantage
is its silicon compatibility (try integrating 1Mgates with the
RF chain, in a III-V technology).
 

...Sorry, the answer given there is complete nonsense.

Could you explain why the fact of some others materials presents less conductivity does not answer the raised question ?
As far I know, it explains exactly from a chemical point of view, the reason.

it has a large resistivityaa as compared to si and Ge.and also its conductivity is also large . there have 4 valence electron which are near to nucleus so it required large energy to move electron.so by these reason we are not used as semiconductor....


+++
 

it has a large resistivityaa as compared to si and Ge.and also its conductivity is also large
Point one:
This statement directly contradicts itself. Resistivity is the exact opposite of condictivity. Thus they can't both be too large,

Point two:
No mention is made of what form of carbon is being discussed. e.g. Graphite and diamond have very different electrical characteristics.

Point three:
The links in my previous post show that diamond semiconductors can offer extremely high performance. Thus any claim that carbon cannot be used as a semicondutor is obviously nonsense.
 

Once physical phenomenon involved is the semiconductivity due to crystals doping on 4-valence elements, it was presumed the comparision would be done to carbon on diamond structure.

However, was notable the insight that due to carbon electrons be closer to nucleon, the potential energy required to remove it is higher than compared on Silicon or Germanium :

Carbon-Silicon-Phosphorus-Arsenic-e1291349216209.jpg




+++
 

Another promising way to utilize carbon for semiconductor devices is carbon nanotubes.

I think it's speculative to predict future potential of carbon semiconductor devices from present knowledge and particularly to hold known disadvantages against it as long they don't involve a principle limitation.
 

Status
Not open for further replies.

Part and Inventory Search

Welcome to EDABoard.com

Sponsor

Back
Top