Continue to Site

Welcome to EDAboard.com

Welcome to our site! EDAboard.com is an international Electronics Discussion Forum focused on EDA software, circuits, schematics, books, theory, papers, asic, pld, 8051, DSP, Network, RF, Analog Design, PCB, Service Manuals... and a whole lot more! To participate you need to register. Registration is free. Click here to register now.

A question about Q factor

Status
Not open for further replies.

overmars

Member level 3
Joined
Sep 11, 2006
Messages
65
Helped
5
Reputation
10
Reaction score
1
Trophy points
1,288
Activity points
1,754
I saw a Q factor in many materials, for capacitor Q=ω•C•Rp and for inductor Q=(ω•L)/Rs

Rp is the equivalent parallel resistor of capacitor and Rs is the serial one for inductor.

What those Q factors mean?

Thanks

Regards!
 

Q-factor means quality of device. The more Q factor the less resistive loss will be.
 

Q stands for Quality Factor, and is a common figure of merit.

Q is the ratio of energy stored per cycle to energy dissipated per cycle: Q = X/R, where X is the reactance and R is the resistance. This is for a reactance and resistance in series, and is often labeled as Qs.

Alternatively, for a reactance and resistance in Parallel, you can define Qp = B/G , where B is the susceptance (1/X) and G is the conductance (1/R). So for an inductor, Q=wL/R (L and R are in series). For a cap, use the second definition: Q=(wC)/(1/R)= wCR (C and R are in parallel)

Another property of Q is that it equals the Bandwidth/center frequency, where BW is usually the 3dB BW.

Hope this clears it up.
 

hi friends small doubt,

What will happen if we go for higher Q-value in our circuits .

1)Is it advantage or diadvantage?

2)What about the sizes of the circuit elements at high values of Q-factor?

3)Is there any instrumetns present to measure the Q-factor directly plz tell me?

Thanks,
tarak
 

a q factor is a ratio of reactance to resistance measured at a certain frequency, so high q factor is good at the frequency you want to use the component at. it really doesnt have much to do with size. again q factor is measured at a specific frequency, so a RLC meter can do it if it has frequency adjustment, a VNA with s-parameter test set is also an expensive way to do it, but usually they are listed in the data sheet.

Added after 1 minutes:

another note, if you have components with different q factors, the overall circuit Q will be driven by the lowest one.
 

> What will happen if we go for higher Q-value in our circuits.
>
> 1)Is it advantage or diadvantage?

A too large Q may be very bad: the larger Q the longer transients in the time
response of the resonant circuit: 2.2Q/(pi f0).

>Q is the ratio of energy stored per cycle to energy dissipated per cycle: Q = X/R,
>where X is the reactance and R is the resistance.

The factor of 2pi is missed here.
 

hi all
In continuation to earlier posts, Q factor also represents the peak of the distribution at the central frequency. The larger the Q factor the more sharp will be the curve and similarly smaller the Q factor more flat would be the curve.
Now let say we have a ckt for radio receiver. A high Q factor receiver will produce a good quality at a precise central frequency (fine tuning) whereas a low Q factor receiver will give average quality over a range of frequencies around the central one.


Regards
tronix
 

Hi,
some More question .I Have Seen That LCRQ Meter Test Q Factor For Inductors Not Capacitors [I Have One Like this ] ,does this Mean Q Factor is Mot there In Capacitors .Seeing The Above discussions i think it is .Fo Are There Devices To Measure That

Amarbir
 

One more disadvantage of too great Q: too narrow receiver bandwidth may demand a too precise transmitter tuning.
 

jasmin_123 said:
The factor of 2pi is missed here.

2pi is only missing if you are working in Hz instead of radians per second, its all relative based on your conversion
 

ender84567 said:
jasmin_123 said:
The factor of 2pi is missed here.

2pi is only missing if you are working in Hz instead of radians per second, its all relative based on your conversion

Q=wo energy stored/average power dissipated in the resistor
Q=2pi energy stored/energy dissipated in one cycle

© Desoer and Kuh

How do you eliminate 2pi in the second equation?
 

the Q is more high, the loss is smaller, this is very important when design LNA and LC filter, thanks
 

High-Q filters have higher insertion losses.
 

Q factor is a ratio of stored energy to loss energy. example in RL circuit, Q is inductive energy to energy dissipated in resistance.
 

reactance X contains frequency w.
Xc for caps, XL for coils, no pi is missing from Q=X/R .

Energy dissipated per cycle equals Power * Period .

Q = W * AVERAGE_ENERGY_STORED_PER_CYCLE / AVG_ENERGY_LOSS_PER_CYCLE

W = 2*PI/PERIOD

all is right, above.

Question for hard brains:

Calculate Q of RL or RC with NON-LINEAR REACTANCE ... How ?

Hint: Not in Desoer-Kuh. Large-signal is key! General case treats hysteresis... Try q = C(v) * v only ...
 

but how do you guys get
Q=X/R
directly from the general definition of Q factor?
 

In fact Q factor is an important parameter of a device. It means: Quality of device. that is the ratio of energy stored in it to the ratio dissipated in it. For example, in the case of capacitor, the modeling shows that a parallel resistor can show the dissipated power and therefore you can state Q=ω.c.R.
 

it is basicaly quality factor,u can find it for any frequency dependent circuit by ωc/(ωh-ωl),where ωc is center frequency or resonent frequency,ωh is higher stop band & ωl is lower stop band,converse for stop band
 

Status
Not open for further replies.

Similar threads

Part and Inventory Search

Welcome to EDABoard.com

Sponsor

Back
Top