Continue to Site

Welcome to EDAboard.com

Welcome to our site! EDAboard.com is an international Electronics Discussion Forum focused on EDA software, circuits, schematics, books, theory, papers, asic, pld, 8051, DSP, Network, RF, Analog Design, PCB, Service Manuals... and a whole lot more! To participate you need to register. Registration is free. Click here to register now.

stub matching vs quarter wavelength transmission line

Status
Not open for further replies.

red turtle

Newbie level 2
Joined
Aug 1, 2007
Messages
2
Helped
0
Reputation
0
Reaction score
0
Trophy points
1,281
Activity points
1,291
what is the advantages and disadvantages of matching by comparing the stub matching with the matching using λ/4 transmission line?
 

quarter wave length transformer is used only for real impedance matching but stubs are used for any case
 

Stub matching can compensate only immaginary parts of an impedance...so to match the real part you use a lambda/4 transformer and if you need to match even the immaginary part you can use a stub...

a l-long stub has impedance equal to: Z(l) = Zo*[Zc+j Zo tan (bl)]/[Zo+j Zc tan (bl)] where Zc is the impedance of the termination (a open or a short) and Zo is the characteristic impedance of the line...

So a stub based on an open circuit has impedance: Z(l) = -j* Zo cotg (bl).
Alternatively a stub with a short has impedance Z(l) = j Zo tan (bl)

As you can see it is EXCLUSIVELY immaginary , i.e. , it is a pure admittance.

Chosing properly l one can tune the immaginary part to the needed value.

I hope i did no mistake in formulas... :)
 

Refer book by
John D. Ryder
Transmission lines & fields.
&
Radio engineering by Terman
This will clear all your doubts regarding matching.
 

Status
Not open for further replies.

Part and Inventory Search

Welcome to EDABoard.com

Sponsor

Back
Top