T
treez
Guest
Page 1 of the UCC28951 datasheet states………………..
UCC28951 datasheet:
https://www.ti.com/lit/ds/symlink/ucc28951.pdf
..However, this is misleading, it is not adaptive delays that help to bring about ZVS….rather, it is the sizing of the primary side series inductor…this is confirmed by the following document…
Simplified Phase-Shifted Full-Bridge Converter Design
**broken link removed**
…..where it says…
Would you agree that the UCC28951 datasheet is misleading here?
“Programmable delays ensure ZVS operation over a wide range of operating conditions, while the load current naturally tunes the switching delays of the secondary-side synchronous rectifiers(SR). This functionality maximizes overall system efficiency.”
If also states that “light load efficiency management is possible with programmable adaptive delays”
UCC28951 datasheet:
https://www.ti.com/lit/ds/symlink/ucc28951.pdf
..However, this is misleading, it is not adaptive delays that help to bring about ZVS….rather, it is the sizing of the primary side series inductor…this is confirmed by the following document…
Simplified Phase-Shifted Full-Bridge Converter Design
**broken link removed**
…..where it says…
“There are many pulse-width modulators (PWM) on the market for controlling a phase-shifted, full-bridge converter with programmable adaptive delays, including Texas Instruments’ new UCC28950 phase-shifted, full-bridge controller. These adaptive delays are used by some engineers to try to reduce the body diode conduction of the H-bridge FETs, which is not the easiest of things to achieve, and also may be difficult to maintain in mass production. The adaptive delay approach used to reduce body diode conduction losses have led to the misconception that adaptive delays are required to achieve zero voltage switching in a phase-shifted, full-bridge converter. Since the average capacitance at the switch nodes (QBd and QDd) and LS and LLK remain approximately the same over line and load, the resonant tank frequency of the switch nodes (fR) should remain roughly the same. Since fR remains roughly the same with the proper selection of LS and LLK, Zero voltage switching can be achieved from 50 to 100 percent load with fixed turn on delays (tAB_DELAY, tCD_DELAY) for FETs QA through QD.”
Would you agree that the UCC28951 datasheet is misleading here?