Welcome to EDAboard.com

Welcome to our site! EDAboard.com is an international Electronic Discussion Forum focused on EDA software, circuits, schematics, books, theory, papers, asic, pld, 8051, DSP, Network, RF, Analog Design, PCB, Service Manuals... and a whole lot more! To participate you need to register. Registration is free. Click here to register now.

Register Log in

Wire Bow-Tie Antenna !! ?

Status
Not open for further replies.

cykopath

Newbie level 1
Joined
May 23, 2011
Messages
1
Helped
0
Reputation
0
Reaction score
0
Trophy points
1,281
Activity points
1,287
I have never used CST but now have to design a bow-tie antenna for some project. If someone could please give link to a tutorial or anything that could help me in building this antenna.:-(
 

BradtheRad

Super Moderator
Staff member
Joined
Apr 1, 2011
Messages
13,739
Helped
2,719
Reputation
5,434
Reaction score
2,636
Trophy points
1,393
Location
Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA
Activity points
102,547
We used to get a bow-tie antenna with tv's. For receiving broadcasts on uhf channels.

About nine inches across. Two leads coming out. Rough shape was a loop but the wires were bent to be close together in the center. At the center was a plastic notch which would attach to the rabbit ears (the larger antenna for vhf channels).

I don't know that the bow-tie is necessarily a better shape for an antenna than the loop. The bowtie could ride on the rabbit ears, thus it was easy to move it around and raise it higher for better reception. The loop antenna on the other hand generally stayed in a fixed position.
 

jiripolivka

Advanced Member level 5
Joined
May 21, 2010
Messages
2,832
Helped
831
Reputation
1,660
Reaction score
802
Trophy points
1,393
Location
Santa Barbara
Activity points
22,012
A bow-tie antenna is in principle a "thick" dipole; at VHF and UHF, you can use equally well (electrically) two triangles cut of metal sheet.
The advantage of this structure is that it is a good dipole for a wider frequency band. In some cases it was found later that cutting the triangles into a pair of narrower "fingers" and setting the dipole length to one wavelength was better for wideband matching to e.g. 300 Ohms.
 

Status
Not open for further replies.
Toggle Sidebar

Part and Inventory Search

Welcome to EDABoard.com

Sponsor

Top