Continue to Site

Welcome to EDAboard.com

Welcome to our site! EDAboard.com is an international Electronics Discussion Forum focused on EDA software, circuits, schematics, books, theory, papers, asic, pld, 8051, DSP, Network, RF, Analog Design, PCB, Service Manuals... and a whole lot more! To participate you need to register. Registration is free. Click here to register now.

Why we take antenna height always at λ/2 and &#

Status
Not open for further replies.

hiyan

Member level 5
Joined
Jan 9, 2006
Messages
92
Helped
5
Reputation
10
Reaction score
4
Trophy points
1,288
Activity points
1,967
Height of Antenna

i have a question which is simple as well tricky i read alot of material but not satisfied me .

can any one explain me why we take antenna height always λ/2 and λ/4?
 

Re: Height of Antenna

The input impedance at those heights have desirable qualities, such as being purely real.
 

Re: Height of Antenna

Antenna height is not always λ/4 or λ/2.
Antenna height is dictated by two factors: Fresnel zone, and ground image of the antenna.
In principle height shall be greater than λ to get best performances.
Increasing the height extends the line-of-sight distance and reduces the effects of objects on the ground.
 

Re: Height of Antenna

but most of teh time it's λ/2 and λ/4 why ?give a solid reason
 

Re: Height of Antenna

hiyan said:
but most of teh time it's λ/2 and λ/4 why ?give a solid reason

λ/2 is used for a symmetrical dipole, this one is feed in the middle and has an impedance of about 240 to 300 Ohm typically. The dipole itself consists of two wires with λ/4 length each.

If you cut away one half of the dipole and replace the middle line with a conducting ground plane you end up with a monopole of λ/4 in length. Varying the monopole distance over the ground plane will give a point were the impedance is around 50 Ohm.

When you want to build antennas with more gain you will have to "compress" the power in one direction, that means that the power in other (possibly unused) directions will be reduced. This can be achived by a 5/8λ monopole, but that one will never have an impedance of 50 Ohm so it must be connected via a small coil that transforms the impedance. This monopole reduces the side lobes so the power that will be "lost" in these side lobes will be fed into a torroid type power diagram.

You may want to read the famous antenna book by Balanis if you desire.

CU
 

Re: Height of Antenna

I think here you mix words “height” with “length” or “dimension”. These ones are usually λ/4 or λ/2.
Height from the ground of the antenna should be greater than λ, to get the best performances.
 

Re: Height of Antenna

I agree with vfone .

The length for small antennas is usually λ/4 or λ/2 due to the resonance structure.

But the antenna height is usually close to the ground because of the coupling.
 

Re: Height of Antenna

Hi
I think that this file will help youo to understund some element thinks about antenna.
 

Re: Height of Antenna

THank you all
 

Status
Not open for further replies.

Part and Inventory Search

Welcome to EDABoard.com

Sponsor

Back
Top