Continue to Site

Welcome to EDAboard.com

Welcome to our site! EDAboard.com is an international Electronics Discussion Forum focused on EDA software, circuits, schematics, books, theory, papers, asic, pld, 8051, DSP, Network, RF, Analog Design, PCB, Service Manuals... and a whole lot more! To participate you need to register. Registration is free. Click here to register now.

Why tweaking filter makes S11 change while S21 is constant?

Status
Not open for further replies.

Terminator3

Advanced Member level 3
Joined
Feb 25, 2012
Messages
802
Helped
71
Reputation
142
Reaction score
63
Trophy points
1,308
Activity points
9,027
I can't understand how S11 can be constant, while S21 changes (in software simulation).
For example, same filter with small adjustment in configuration:
configuration1: S21=-2.5dB, S11=-11dB
configuration2: S21=-2.5dB, S11=-17dB

If i use real measurements with network analyzer, would it be similar? Where that 17dB-11dB=6dB comes from if S21 is almost constant?
 

I can't understand how S11 can be constant, while S21 changes (in software simulation).
For example, same filter with small adjustment in configuration:
configuration1: S21=-2.5dB, S11=-11dB
configuration2: S21=-2.5dB, S11=-17dB

You are right: this is only possible if the losses change (dissipation or radiation).
For constant losses in the filter, |S11|^2 + |S21|^2 = const
 
Is related to loaded-Q tuning of the resonators part of the filter.
This is the reason that sometime a multi-pole filter can have less inband insertion loss (S21), than let's say a 3-pole filter.
The resonators part of the multi-pole filter could get higher Q because they are less "loaded" by the input/output impedances.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Part and Inventory Search

Welcome to EDABoard.com

Sponsor

Back
Top