Continue to Site

Welcome to EDAboard.com

Welcome to our site! EDAboard.com is an international Electronics Discussion Forum focused on EDA software, circuits, schematics, books, theory, papers, asic, pld, 8051, DSP, Network, RF, Analog Design, PCB, Service Manuals... and a whole lot more! To participate you need to register. Registration is free. Click here to register now.

Register Log in

Which numbers are harder to be misinterpreted

Status
Not open for further replies.
S

Sink0

Full Member level 6
Full Member level 6
Joined
Nov 25, 2009
Messages
390
Helped
37
Reputation
74
Reaction score
30
Trophy points
1,308
Location
Sao Paulo, Brazil
Activity points
4,186
I am implementing a multipoint bus network and i need help to chose which number are harder to be misinterpreted on a simple oversampling for clock recovery. I mean.. most of the packages will have a CRC, but ACKs, NACKs, and POLL commands wont. So i am afraid any node on the network can interpreted a ACK as a NACK or as POLL as they wont have any extra error checking. There are others safeguards as timeouts and Ids to discard duplicated messages, but i want to reduce the chance of this specific error. The commands are 8-bit long.. so which 3 8-bit long streams are harder to be misinterpreted between them?

tahnk you!
 

Status
Not open for further replies.

Similar threads

Part and Inventory Search

Welcome to EDABoard.com

Sponsor

Back
Top