Welcome to EDAboard.com

Welcome to our site! EDAboard.com is an international Electronic Discussion Forum focused on EDA software, circuits, schematics, books, theory, papers, asic, pld, 8051, DSP, Network, RF, Analog Design, PCB, Service Manuals... and a whole lot more! To participate you need to register. Registration is free. Click here to register now.

Register Log in

Which EDA software is better, Eagleware or ADS?

Status
Not open for further replies.

reshaping

Newbie level 1
Joined
Jan 16, 2003
Messages
0
Helped
0
Reputation
0
Reaction score
0
Trophy points
1,280
Activity points
140
Eagleware and ADS

I would like to compare the advantage and disadvantage between
the Eagleware and ADS Microwave EDA software.
Somebody can tell me ?
 

zgx

Member level 1
Joined
Feb 25, 2002
Messages
38
Helped
1
Reputation
2
Reaction score
0
Trophy points
1,286
Activity points
162
Eagleware is famouse for its synthsis functions, its model is simple. ADS has very large, complex model and function,it can design any circuits,but it is costly.
 

Rayengine

Full Member level 5
Joined
May 18, 2001
Messages
287
Helped
3
Reputation
6
Reaction score
3
Trophy points
1,298
Location
Hong Kong
Activity points
1,737
The former name of Eagleware is Compact which use small modules to provide different circuit simulation. ADS which also include system simulation, DSP simulation, EM (Momentum - Seems it is seldom discuss in the forum) which is quite sophisticated. And now @glient partner with Cadence to enhance it RFIC capacibility.

So if need comparation, I just say it is two different things.
 

Encrypted

Advanced Member level 4
Joined
May 28, 2001
Messages
115
Helped
17
Reputation
36
Reaction score
5
Trophy points
1,298
Activity points
705
Compact was actually sold to Ansoft, nothing to do with Eagleware!
 

toonafishy

Full Member level 6
Joined
Jun 18, 2002
Messages
369
Helped
38
Reputation
76
Reaction score
12
Trophy points
1,298
Location
Earth
Activity points
3,187
E/a/g/l/e/w/a/r/e is easy to use and would be my choice for day to day u/s/e. @/D/S is much more complex but can handle bigger problems.
 

loucy

Advanced Member level 1
Joined
Aug 26, 2001
Messages
414
Helped
24
Reputation
48
Reaction score
11
Trophy points
1,298
Activity points
4,657
What about the bugs in these two?
 

shou

Member level 4
Joined
Sep 5, 2001
Messages
77
Helped
0
Reputation
0
Reaction score
0
Trophy points
1,286
Activity points
417
i think the E/a/g/l/e/w/a/r/e is better for amp design.
but i prefer @D$
 

yingyang

Full Member level 2
Joined
Dec 26, 2002
Messages
126
Helped
2
Reputation
4
Reaction score
2
Trophy points
1,298
Activity points
862
eagleware

The port definition in eagleware is rather weird... and not friendly....
 

byron

Member level 3
Joined
Jan 25, 2002
Messages
62
Helped
1
Reputation
2
Reaction score
1
Trophy points
1,288
Activity points
372
A/D/S is more powerful than genesys and I donnot thinks A/D/S is difficult to use. Most vendors support A/D/S.
 

sugm

Member level 2
Joined
Dec 11, 2001
Messages
47
Helped
1
Reputation
2
Reaction score
1
Trophy points
1,288
Activity points
253
The feature of eagleware is filter design.
ADS is for circuit and system simulation.
 

egliu

Member level 4
Joined
Jan 15, 2003
Messages
71
Helped
0
Reputation
0
Reaction score
0
Trophy points
1,286
Activity points
587
re

the former is easy to be used, but @ds is for expert
 

toonafishy

Full Member level 6
Joined
Jun 18, 2002
Messages
369
Helped
38
Reputation
76
Reaction score
12
Trophy points
1,298
Location
Earth
Activity points
3,187
I have seen very few bugs in either of these products.
 

sviodo

Member level 4
Joined
Jan 2, 2002
Messages
68
Helped
1
Reputation
2
Reaction score
1
Trophy points
1,288
Activity points
533
sugm said all the truth but one - eagleware genesys is cheaper if you have to buy it :)
 

filterman

Member level 2
Joined
Jan 18, 2002
Messages
52
Helped
1
Reputation
2
Reaction score
1
Trophy points
1,288
Activity points
512
[I use Eagleware and ADS.
Eagleware is relatively frendly and cheap and very usefull, but if I don't use EM which is very slow in Eagleware, them I usually finish FILTER circuits in ADS or Serenede then conclude with EM session on Momentum or IE3D.
 

loucy

Advanced Member level 1
Joined
Aug 26, 2001
Messages
414
Helped
24
Reputation
48
Reaction score
11
Trophy points
1,298
Activity points
4,657
What is the method used in Genesys's field solver?
 

Encrypted

Advanced Member level 4
Joined
May 28, 2001
Messages
115
Helped
17
Reputation
36
Reaction score
5
Trophy points
1,298
Activity points
705
From Genesys help file:

Most commercial electromagnetic (EM) simulators designed for MIC and MMIC work are based on integral equations and the method of moments (MoM). EMPOWER is based on the method of lines (MoL). This technique has excellent error convergence properties and submits well to code optimization to minimize numeric complexity.

The root of EMPOWER is work which began in 1987 at the Novosibirsk Electrical Engineering Institute. This lead to the commercial development of TAMIC in 1991 in Moscow. TAMIC saw commercial use in the Soviet Union and elsewhere. In late 1996, Eagleware acquired TAMIC and the principle contributor joined Eagleware to begin significant improvements. The code was integrated into the GENESYS environment at release Version 6.5 in 1998.
 

shou

Member level 4
Joined
Sep 5, 2001
Messages
77
Helped
0
Reputation
0
Reaction score
0
Trophy points
1,286
Activity points
417
i think @d5 is the best in rf design.
 

filterman

Member level 2
Joined
Jan 18, 2002
Messages
52
Helped
1
Reputation
2
Reaction score
1
Trophy points
1,288
Activity points
512
Depends on the talent and knowledge of the engineer.
A good engineer may make most softwares look excellent?
 

harkonnen

Member level 4
Joined
Apr 14, 2002
Messages
69
Helped
1
Reputation
2
Reaction score
1
Trophy points
1,288
Activity points
678
Ea/gle/ware is comparable to Microwave O/ff/ice.

Both work in the frequency domain and are there quite powerful and especially easy to use.

@ds has much more versatility but it has a learning curve. It has a transient solver as well and you can user program a lot.
Especially for MMIC design it is better because you can build you own transistor models and program alot more.
 

shou

Member level 4
Joined
Sep 5, 2001
Messages
77
Helped
0
Reputation
0
Reaction score
0
Trophy points
1,286
Activity points
417
For a designer or a research, any EDA is always a tool. experiment is always necessary.
 

Status
Not open for further replies.
Toggle Sidebar

Part and Inventory Search

Welcome to EDABoard.com

Sponsor

Top