In my original scenario I suggested that the power company had never connected the neutral conductor to the earth, anywhere. Why therefore, would there be a difference in potential between the live conductor and earth in that case?
Shock protection is facilitatd if in an electric appliance there is any leakage current then it will be dangerous to touch it but if there is an earth terminal connected to the body of the appliance, the leakage current will be returned to ground thus provide safety to the user.
Sidd
ricksidd said:In my original scenario I suggested that the power company had never connected the neutral conductor to the earth, anywhere. Why therefore, would there be a difference in potential between the live conductor and earth in that case?
i think the question is not correct....the neutral conductor is never connected to the earth, its the return path of the completed electric circuit which terminates at the generating coil.
Ground earth is a separate mechanism to provide an low resistance path for the unbalanced or leakage current in the circuit. In implementation its the copper plates embedded deep in the ground
Sidd
As I said earlier, it is the copper plate/plates which are required to be embedded in the ground. Due to a larger surface area of plates the impedance will be ~ Zero (very Low). You can actuallully measure it. If you are using copper rod that is not going to serve the purpose as the impedance craeted will no be ~ Zero. Moreover, sometimes we have to go for more than one plates conneccted parallelly.I slammed a 6-feet copper rod into the ground which does the trick.
It is important to realize that there are several purposes of a ground system. The
concept of a ground as being a zero-potential surface may be appropriate at dc or
low frequencies, but is never true at higher frequencies, since conductors have significant impedance (inductance) and high-frequency currents flow through these
impedances, resulting in points on the ground having different high-frequency
potentials.
This highlights the distinction between the two types of ground:
safety ground and signal ground.
1. Safety Ground:
Commercial power is utilized as 120 V, 60 Hz voltage in the United States (240 V, 50 Hz in Europe). A safety ground is normally required in order to provide protection against shock hazard. This safety ground is generally called “chassis ground.” In addition to shock protection, it also serves an important role in draining electrostatic discharge (ESD) charge.
2 Signal Ground:
The other type of ground is the signal ground along which the signal currents return
to their source. So we should think of signal ground as the return path for signal
currents and not as an equipotential conductor surface (which it is not). It is important to emphasize that although it may be the designer’s intent for the signals to return to their source through these designated paths, there is no guarantee that this will occur! In fact, some frequency components of that same signal may return through one path, while other frequency components of that same signal may return through another path. A shielded cable above a ground plane is a good example. The frequency components that are below the cutoff frequency of the shield–ground plane circuit will return along the ground plane, but those above this cutoff frequency will return along the shield and not the ground plane
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?