loucy said:div,
Can you tell us why you are interested in the mutual coupling?
Lupin said:....
Maybe you could find and send me some article about phased array so I can compare the results and optimize the computation time of my code (at the moment it's about 1 minute to evaluate 4 cuts and 1 contour plot for a planar array of 3 x 6 elements).....
I think that the best thing to do is the cooperation...
Regards
Lupin
Lupin said:Tapa: Ensemble code is accurated but it's a 2.5 D software.. If you have complex transictions, you have to use or CST, or HFSS.. direct competitor... Someone says that CST us good for "closed structures" and HFSS for "radiating structures".. In my opinion, they are both for every type of object...
Dderjken: I'm searching IEEE articles about phased arrays, for what concerns your structure, tell me all your requirements (as Polarization, Bandwidth, Pattern Shape and so on.....) and I'll surely help you.
So, at the moment, if you want a code, you can download PCAAD 2.1 (by Pozar) or LINPLAN...easy to find in Internet.. I've compared my code with PCAAD and the results are the same.. however I've some problem about Directivity computation. I want the rigorous computation....
In my spare time I'm trying to solve it..
Regards
Lupin
div said:Hi:
These days, I am also interested in coupling
between patches.
Can some one give suggestion about
Cavity model?
Div
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?