Welcome to EDAboard.com

Welcome to our site! EDAboard.com is an international Electronic Discussion Forum focused on EDA software, circuits, schematics, books, theory, papers, asic, pld, 8051, DSP, Network, RF, Analog Design, PCB, Service Manuals... and a whole lot more! To participate you need to register. Registration is free. Click here to register now.

Register Log in

What is easier to learn ubicom sx or avr?

Status
Not open for further replies.

Marmelado

Member level 2
Joined
Apr 6, 2002
Messages
42
Helped
0
Reputation
0
Reaction score
0
Trophy points
1,286
Activity points
241
ubicom sx

Hi!
what is easier to learn?
ubicom sx or atmel avr?
Thanks!
 

cdcll

Full Member level 3
Joined
Feb 15, 2002
Messages
163
Helped
8
Reputation
16
Reaction score
1
Trophy points
1,298
Activity points
1,199
avr vs sx

Ubicom sx uses software virtual peripheral, it is a good MCU if your design is not time critical, and I think more design resouces are available for Atmel avr's and more people are using avr's, for learning, I think both of them are OK.
 

silvio

Advanced Member level 3
Joined
Dec 31, 2001
Messages
716
Helped
105
Reputation
210
Reaction score
16
Trophy points
1,298
Location
Romania
Activity points
11,497
ubicom sx or avr?

You must think at:

1.What kind of application you want to develop (however, SX is for time critical design - it has 75 Mips with nice features you wont find on AVR)
2.How would you like to learn:
- low level assembler (much easy for SX if you're coming from PIC world)
- high level C (AVR is much suitable for C than SX, beyond the portability of C, with great support from the field)
3.Future availability and development of microcontroller (SX is dead on development if we're not looking at IP2022)
4.Technical support if you're in trouble (great for AVR, much more debate forums than SX)
5.Price (it's up to you)
 

Marmelado

Member level 2
Joined
Apr 6, 2002
Messages
42
Helped
0
Reputation
0
Reaction score
0
Trophy points
1,286
Activity points
241
I am starting to learn, i heard that sx is fast and can run pic code, but avr is more like 8051 and easier is that true?
 

silvio

Advanced Member level 3
Joined
Dec 31, 2001
Messages
716
Helped
105
Reputation
210
Reaction score
16
Trophy points
1,298
Location
Romania
Activity points
11,497
Hi marmelado,

My advice: Buy a development board according to your budget.
Get used with either C or assembler. You can switch later to other family micro if you feel that need (easier if you start with C).
Mean time take a look at micro architecture Harvard and Van_Neuman, CISC or RISC. It's plenty of information over internet.
Finnaly, don't mix apples with oranges. (8051 and AVR, not necessay in that order).
Though 8051 it's my lovely micro (and that's I'm currently using), I must admit the strength of AVR architecture that was developed in conjuction with C language expert (what I like most is 32 working registers and XYZ indirect address register)

Regards,
Silvio
 

dainis

Advanced Member level 4
Joined
May 15, 2001
Messages
1,126
Helped
53
Reputation
106
Reaction score
9
Trophy points
1,318
Activity points
9,271
Paralax asembler is very similar to 8051 asembler.
First project on SX28 I making on Scenix (Ubicom) example
base, practically without reding SX programming manual.
 

Marmelado

Member level 2
Joined
Apr 6, 2002
Messages
42
Helped
0
Reputation
0
Reaction score
0
Trophy points
1,286
Activity points
241
Well, I have a stk500 and a sxkey, i know there is a lot of support for avr under linux, but what about the sx?Are there any tools to work with the sx in linux?I can't find them:(
 

Status
Not open for further replies.
Toggle Sidebar

Part and Inventory Search

Welcome to EDABoard.com

Sponsor

Top