mami_hacky
Full Member level 6
- Joined
- Mar 28, 2002
- Messages
- 337
- Helped
- 18
- Reputation
- 36
- Reaction score
- 11
- Trophy points
- 1,298
- Location
- Some where
- Activity points
- 3,428
mami_hacky said:OK! Let me describe my design methodology:
First of all, Using HDL Designer, I draw the top block schematic, and then I write the needed verilog codes. ( Or I design the needed State machine, if needed. )
Once the complete set of hdls was generated by HDL Designer, I use NC Sim to simulate the design. There, "schematic drawing" capability of SimVision help me a lot to realize where I have mistakes.
Now, I want exatcly to know, If this capability is better in Novas Debussy than SimVision.
Thanks.
luoliuzhu said:I think debussy is a very good debug tools , I use debussy to ECO my design. it can help me find easyly some error ,and rewrite the netlist.
so i very like this!
Leo said:luoliuzhu said:I think debussy is a very good debug tools , I use debussy to ECO my design. it can help me find easyly some error ,and rewrite the netlist.
so i very like this!
ye,I think so,debussy is a tool to debug easily;But I find it not capacibility to support Spice netlist!
If it can do it I think it will be better!
Interesting price comparison - is this 50K for Simvision ALONE or is it for NCSIM + SimVision? I guess it is the latter, if so your comparison is not apples-2-apples. NC is a full fledged simulator + debug tool, Debussy is a *GREAT* debug tool, but not a HDL simulator.kwkam said:At some point of view, debussy is a schematic, waveform and code viewer and editor. It have almost all function in the simvision. But it is a lot cheaper than simvision. Cadence simvision cost US$50K and debussy cost around US$5K
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?