Welcome to EDAboard.com

Welcome to our site! EDAboard.com is an international Electronic Discussion Forum focused on EDA software, circuits, schematics, books, theory, papers, asic, pld, 8051, DSP, Network, RF, Analog Design, PCB, Service Manuals... and a whole lot more! To participate you need to register. Registration is free. Click here to register now.

Register Log in

understanding maximum power transfer theorem

Status
Not open for further replies.

PG1995

Full Member level 5
Joined
Apr 18, 2011
Messages
248
Helped
1
Reputation
2
Reaction score
1
Trophy points
1,298
Activity points
3,717
Hi :smile:

I'm trying to understand 'background' working of the maximum power transfer which says that power transfer takes place across R_L when it is equal to R_th (R_L is load resistance and R_th is Thevenin resistance). It is easily proved by doing some math.

P=VI, P=I^2.R, P=V^2/R, V=IR

Let's focus on P=V^2/R_L. To have maximum power transfer to R_L, V should be as large as power (V is volts dropped across R_L). V across R_L could be found using voltage divider rule: (R_L x E)/(R_L + R_th). Further R_L should be as little as possible because it is denominator. But also note that making R_L smaller would reduce the volts dropped across R_L.

But now focus on P=I^2.R_L. Compare it with the previous analysis of P=V^2/R_L. In (I^2.R_L), R_L should be as large as possible which is in contrast with the previous analysis which required R_L to be minimum. So some compromise is needed. But there is another point to note. R_L and R_th are in series so if R_L is made too big then the value of I would drop.

I hope you could see where I'm coming from (or, rather trying to come from! ). Could you please help me to really understand the working of maximum power transfer theorem? Many thanks.
 

vinodstanur

Advanced Member level 3
Joined
Oct 31, 2009
Messages
750
Helped
114
Reputation
234
Reaction score
114
Trophy points
1,333
Location
Kerala (INDIA)
Activity points
7,049
[/url][/IMG]
Just look above figure. It is a practical power source which will have an internal resistance greater than 0.

Now if u want to take maximum voltage at O/P then by using voltage divider law, u will get RL=\infty
In this case, power=0. ({v}^{2 }/infinity )=0


Now if u want maximum current O/P then u can decrease ur RL. right?
So if u decrease it to 0, then u will ger max current as V/Rth. At this time maximum power is delivered across the Rth.
But still , power O/P(power transfer) is 0. ({I}^{ 2} * 0)=0
U could not use {V}^{ 2} /R equation because it is 0/0 form. (V out=0; RL=0)

So the power O/P is zero for RL=0 & RL=infinity.

Now, the power O/P is maximum at a particular value of RL . But it depends on the internal resistance Rth.

For finding the value of RL for maximum ,
u can simply differentiate the Power Output with RL.
Then at peak power value, the rate of change of power with respect to RL will be zero.
So to find it, just substitute
dP/dRL=0;
Now u will get Rth =RL

This means the maximum value of power output will be when Tth = RL.
 
Last edited:

BradtheRad

Super Moderator
Staff member
Joined
Apr 1, 2011
Messages
13,739
Helped
2,719
Reputation
5,434
Reaction score
2,636
Trophy points
1,393
Location
Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA
Activity points
102,547
As vinodstanur states, the V and A conditions for peak power output depends on the invisible (internal) resistance of the source.

I once made graphs of a few power supplies. I attached loads of various resistances (R_L).

I measured V across load. I measured A through load.

The x axis of my graph was load resistance (R_L).

For the y axis I superimposed several plots, namely V, A, and W.

The V plot was a gentle curve. The A plot was a gentle curve.
Low V coincided with high A.
High V coincided with low A. (Not surprising.)

For each load I had to calculate W.

When I plotted W for all loads, the curve was shaped like a bell. The top was where peak power occurred.

That's when I realized I had been unable to predict ahead of time where the top would be, that is, which R_L would yield V and A which would draw the maximum W.

I had to find out by experimentation.

I'd seen the rule that says peak power transfer occurs when load resistance equals source resistance. So I guess I took it for granted that the peak power would be at the point R_L was identical to the internal R of my supply.

I also remember that I had to custom connect a series of various loads, to get fine enough resolution of points at the top of the bell curve. The peak could not have been determined without my doing so.
 
Last edited:

Miguel Gaspar

Advanced Member level 1
Joined
Mar 6, 2006
Messages
479
Helped
70
Reputation
140
Reaction score
34
Trophy points
1,308
Location
Culiacán, Sinaloa, Mexico
Activity points
4,971

PG1995

Full Member level 5
Joined
Apr 18, 2011
Messages
248
Helped
1
Reputation
2
Reaction score
1
Trophy points
1,298
Activity points
3,717
Hi again,

1: Just curious to know if there is also a minimum power transfer theorem of some kind.

2: When R_L is not equal to R_Th, then the power dissipated by the R_L won't be maximum. Is this because of the voltage drop across R_Th?

Please help me out. Thank you
 

enjunear

Advanced Member level 3
Joined
Dec 21, 2010
Messages
960
Helped
309
Reputation
618
Reaction score
303
Trophy points
1,343
Location
USA, midwest
Activity points
9,749
1: Just curious to know if there is also a minimum power transfer theorem of some kind.
There is no such theorem, but it would be when V on R_L = 0V or I through R_L = 0 amps. Then you have minimum power transfer (like vinodstanur said, when R_L = infinity or R_L = short-circuit).

2: When R_L is not equal to R_Th, then the power dissipated by the R_L won't be maximum. Is this because of the voltage drop across R_Th?
The reason is that you are not at the optimal point on the dP/dR_L curve (try solving your circuit equation for power in R_L for several values of R_L and plotting them, P_R_L vs. R_L). If R_L = R_Th is the maximum power condition, when R_L is smaller than R_Th, the same current passes through R_Th and R_L, but more voltage is dropped across R_Th, so R_L has less voltage across it, and less dissipated power. When R_L is larger than R_Th, more voltage is dropped across R_L, but less current flows through both parts, also causing less power to be dissipated by R_L.

Power is made up of both voltage and current, so when you decrease one, the total power dissipation value falls. R_L = R_Th is the sweet spot where the product of the voltage across R_L and current through it is maximized.
 
  • Like
Reactions: PG1995

    PG1995

    points: 2
    Helpful Answer Positive Rating
Status
Not open for further replies.
Toggle Sidebar

Part and Inventory Search

Welcome to EDABoard.com

Sponsor

Top