grizedale
Advanced Member level 3
Hello,
In the following article , do you agree that the "n" value in Equation 6 , page 2 SHOULD BE "NS/NP"?
https://www.fairchildsemi.com/an/AN/AN-4151.pdf
In figure 6, it says "n = NP/NS".......but this is surely wrong?
"n" is in the numerator of equation 6, page 2, and so it ABSOLUTELY MUST be "NS/NP"....do you agree?
...otherwise , gain increases with increasing primary:secondary turns ratio...which would be nonsense?
.....
In the following article , do you agree that the "n" value in Equation 6 , page 2 SHOULD BE "NS/NP"?
https://www.fairchildsemi.com/an/AN/AN-4151.pdf
In figure 6, it says "n = NP/NS".......but this is surely wrong?
"n" is in the numerator of equation 6, page 2, and so it ABSOLUTELY MUST be "NS/NP"....do you agree?
...otherwise , gain increases with increasing primary:secondary turns ratio...which would be nonsense?
.....