Hi,
We used the p+ resistor in our design. We know there are some parasitic reversed pn junction capacitance for p+resistor. I want to know is it this parasitcic junction capacitance has been included in the spice model? i.e., the pre-layout design has considered this effect when spice simulation?
Hi,
We used the p+ resistor in our design. We know there are some parasitic reversed pn junction capacitance for p+resistor. I want to know is it this parasitcic junction capacitance has been included in the spice model? i.e., the pre-layout design has considered this effect when spice simulation?
Hi,
We used the p+ resistor in our design. We know there are some parasitic reversed pn junction capacitance for p+resistor. I want to know is it this parasitcic junction capacitance has been included in the spice model? i.e., the pre-layout design has considered this effect when spice simulation?
I replaced the p+resistor with an ideal resistor and redo the simulation, but found the bandwidth has no any descrepancy. The p+resistor is the load of the diff pair. As my understanding, the parasitic pn capacitance should affect the bandwidth if it is inclueded in simulation.
Hi,
We used the p+ resistor in our design. We know there are some parasitic reversed pn junction capacitance for p+resistor. I want to know is it this parasitcic junction capacitance has been included in the spice model? i.e., the pre-layout design has considered this effect when spice simulation?
It depends on the model. You can view the model file to find whether the parasitic junction is included. Chances are junction capacitance is not included, but voltage coefficient is include.