sai1711
Newbie level 5
- Joined
- Jul 28, 2010
- Messages
- 8
- Helped
- 0
- Reputation
- 0
- Reaction score
- 0
- Trophy points
- 1,281
- Activity points
- 1,353
Hi All,
I am one of those who uses the FPGA once in a blue moon. As my major part has to deal with Analog field. So am teh worst kinds of newbies you would ever find . :grin:
I have seen a lot of codes on the forum on the aspect of Division VHDL code, I found that they are pretty much useless when we want to implement them onto an FPGA board.
I have the following inferences:
- Is the traditional way of binary division the only way forwards? can any sacred soul confirm this to me? It sucks when u dont have a guide or any colleague who has any idea on this field.
- CORDIC IP core makes the hardware too bulky? Also, I somehow always avoid using cordic ip cores. Prime reason being, there are other shortcut ways of doing the same. e.g. Sinewave generator.
An overview and confirmation from an expert would be a morale booster.
I am one of those who uses the FPGA once in a blue moon. As my major part has to deal with Analog field. So am teh worst kinds of newbies you would ever find . :grin:
I have seen a lot of codes on the forum on the aspect of Division VHDL code, I found that they are pretty much useless when we want to implement them onto an FPGA board.
I have the following inferences:
- Is the traditional way of binary division the only way forwards? can any sacred soul confirm this to me? It sucks when u dont have a guide or any colleague who has any idea on this field.
- CORDIC IP core makes the hardware too bulky? Also, I somehow always avoid using cordic ip cores. Prime reason being, there are other shortcut ways of doing the same. e.g. Sinewave generator.
An overview and confirmation from an expert would be a morale booster.