Continue to Site

Welcome to EDAboard.com

Welcome to our site! EDAboard.com is an international Electronics Discussion Forum focused on EDA software, circuits, schematics, books, theory, papers, asic, pld, 8051, DSP, Network, RF, Analog Design, PCB, Service Manuals... and a whole lot more! To participate you need to register. Registration is free. Click here to register now.

stability and phase bode plot

Status
Not open for further replies.

greenjuice

Member level 1
Member level 1
Joined
Aug 21, 2015
Messages
40
Helped
0
Reputation
0
Reaction score
0
Trophy points
6
Visit site
Activity points
348
As my attached picture, if we have negative feedback system, we should make unity gain be within -180 phase not to oscillate our system, considering the number of pole in amp.

And I think,

upper unity gain frequency, my Aol(in the picture) already has -180 phase because amp has negative gain. so without considering the number of pole in amp, -180 by gain + -180 by negative feedback.. = -360 phase so. my system could osciilate.
But in real, amp has several pole. so it is not oscillate.

Is my view right? I'm so confused.

Plus, why does amp have -90 phase at the pole?

Block_Diagram_for_Feedback_svg.png
 

An opamp has a frequency compensation capacitor inside that rolls off its high frequency gain. At the frequency where the internal phase shifts of the opamp cause its output to have a phase shift of 180 degrees then the gain is less than 1 so it does not oscillate when negative feedback is added.
 
op amp already has negative voltage gain. It means that op amp already has 180 phase shift.

Is phase shift by pole in op amp additonal?

or phase shift by pole in op amp make totally negative voltage gain(180 phase shift)

I'm so confused..
 
Last edited:

op amp already has negative voltage gain. It means that op amp already has 180 phase shift.
Negative feedback has 180 degrees phase shift.

Is phase shift by pole in op amp additonal? or phase shift by pole in op amp make totally negative voltage gain(180 phase shift).
The pole that rolls off the high frequencies produces 90 degrees phase shift. Its cutoff frequency is low enough to dominate the phase shifts because at a frequency where another phase shift in the opamp occurs, this dominant pole reduces the gain to less than 1 so the opamp does not oscillate when any amount of negative feedback is used.
 
As my attached picture, if we have negative feedback system, we should make unity gain be within -180 phase not to oscillate our system, considering the number of pole in amp.

And I think,

upper unity gain frequency, my Aol(in the picture) already has -180 phase because amp has negative gain. so without considering the number of pole in amp, -180 by gain + -180 by negative feedback.. = -360 phase so. my system could osciilate.
But in real, amp has several pole. so it is not oscillate.

Is my view right? I'm so confused.

Plus, why does amp have -90 phase at the pole?

View attachment 121620

Discussing stability properties and tendency to oscillations you have to consider LOOP GAIN only - that is the gain of the complete feedback loop, including the negative sign.
In your case: Lop gain LG=- Aol*beta.
 

Status
Not open for further replies.

Part and Inventory Search

Welcome to EDABoard.com

Sponsor

Back
Top