Continue to Site

Welcome to EDAboard.com

Welcome to our site! EDAboard.com is an international Electronics Discussion Forum focused on EDA software, circuits, schematics, books, theory, papers, asic, pld, 8051, DSP, Network, RF, Analog Design, PCB, Service Manuals... and a whole lot more! To participate you need to register. Registration is free. Click here to register now.

SMA bad connection mismatch in PCB from 6.5 GHz (measurement and HFSS simulation)

Status
Not open for further replies.

votientu

Member level 2
Joined
Oct 27, 2012
Messages
47
Helped
0
Reputation
0
Reaction score
0
Trophy points
1,286
Activity points
1,647
Hello,

I simulate the SMA model in HFSS (a PCB board which comprises of 2 SMA connectors and a transmission line) and it shows the mismatch problem.
The mismatch does not come from the transmission line nor coaxial transmission in SMA (I verified it) so I suppose it comes from the connection between SMA and the board.

The SMA model is designed to simulate the SMA connector JOHNSON 142-0701-851 (RF / Coaxial Connector, SMA Coaxial) which works up to 18 GHz.
**broken link removed**

I found it is strange that I see the same mismatch in my measurement with this connector. So I wonder if my installation (as I show in the simulation) is not good ?
Should I choose another SMA connector ?

Thanks !

SMA.pngS11.png
 

Attachments

  • SMA Test.rar
    74 KB · Views: 100

The SMA that you posted is designed for a 1.57 mm PCB thickness. Beware that its central pin width is 0.51 mm, and to get minimum of reflections, the thickness of the 50 ohms transmission line on the PCB should be the same.
 
I changed the central pin width to 0.38 mm to fit the transmission line, but this change does not affect a lot the matching.
I also think the transmission line should be a little bit bigger for solder.

- - - Updated - - -

The SMA that you posted is designed for a 1.57 mm PCB thickness. Beware that its central pin width is 0.51 mm, and to get minimum of reflections, the thickness of the 50 ohms transmission line on the PCB should be the same.

The same result when I change the central pin width to 0.51 mm, and I change h substrate to 0.303 mm to have the transmission line width of 0.67 mm.
S11_051.png

Here the hfss simulation :

View attachment SMA Test.zip
 

Status
Not open for further replies.

Similar threads

Part and Inventory Search

Welcome to EDABoard.com

Sponsor

Back
Top