Continue to Site

Welcome to EDAboard.com

Welcome to our site! EDAboard.com is an international Electronics Discussion Forum focused on EDA software, circuits, schematics, books, theory, papers, asic, pld, 8051, DSP, Network, RF, Analog Design, PCB, Service Manuals... and a whole lot more! To participate you need to register. Registration is free. Click here to register now.

Simple R L C circuit Critically Damped Response

Status
Not open for further replies.

andy93

Newbie level 3
Newbie level 3
Joined
Jan 18, 2013
Messages
4
Helped
0
Reputation
0
Reaction score
0
Trophy points
1,281
Visit site
Activity points
1,311
I wonder if anyone can help with my magnet launcher experiments? I've obtained 56 1000uF 450V caps which I plan to wire in parallel to make one 56,000uF 450v which I will discharge into a coil (by smacking two copper plates together with a hammer) .I guess I need to design the coil so that the resistance and inductance is such as to cause a critically damped response? How do I do this , first ignoring the effect on inductance caused by the projectile, then what effect would an iron or neodymium magnet entering the coil have on the calculations. Is it OK to take the caps a little over their rated value, just for a few seconds? Thanks in advance for your help...
 

Old fahioned caps used with valve equipments were often rated for different "surge" and "working" voltages. Caps now a days are much better in terms of leakage but as the manufacturing processes are much tighter, I would suspect that they are running at 90% of their breakdown voltage. Try them out individually with a 100K current limiting resistor and make up your own mind. By the way when these capacitors fail, they go off like a bomb, blowing out the seal or rubber bung, throwing out a lot of ali foil and chemicals. So point them away from yourself when testing them (or using them).
The effect of the projectile would be to kill the Q of the inductance and its inductance. I was under the impression that the projectile had to be high conductance as it was the induced magnetic field in it that caused the movement*. And copper will only reduce the inductance of a coil by 20%, not to 3%?
Frank
* Look at any AC induction motor, they have a magnetic rotor to capture the field but with copper or ali bars to provide the high current for the repulsive forces.
 

Thanks for that ... regarding the copper projectile, if it were a ring or cylinder preferably with an insulated iron core , I could see that working ,worth investigating , but wouldn't solid copper 'short out' the effect?
Old fahioned caps used with valve equipments were often rated for different "surge" and "working" voltages. Caps now a days are much better in terms of leakage but as the manufacturing processes are much tighter, I would suspect that they are running at 90% of their breakdown voltage. Try them out individually with a 100K current limiting resistor and make up your own mind. By the way when these capacitors fail, they go off like a bomb, blowing out the seal or rubber bung, throwing out a lot of ali foil and chemicals. So point them away from yourself when testing them (or using them).
The effect of the projectile would be to kill the Q of the inductance and its inductance. I was under the impression that the projectile had to be high conductance as it was the induced magnetic field in it that caused the movement*. And copper will only reduce the inductance of a coil by 20%, not to 3%?
Frank
* Look at any AC induction motor, they have a magnetic rotor to capture the field but with copper or ali bars to provide the high current for the repulsive forces.
 

Status
Not open for further replies.

Similar threads

Part and Inventory Search

Welcome to EDABoard.com

Sponsor

Back
Top