Welcome to EDAboard.com

Welcome to our site! EDAboard.com is an international Electronics Discussion Forum focused on EDA software, circuits, schematics, books, theory, papers, asic, pld, 8051, DSP, Network, RF, Analog Design, PCB, Service Manuals... and a whole lot more! To participate you need to register. Registration is free. Click here to register now.

sensitivity in filters and number of bits of system

akbarza

Member level 5
Joined
Dec 18, 2013
Messages
92
Helped
0
Reputation
0
Reaction score
0
Trophy points
1,286
Activity points
2,199
hi
i read a pdf file that i think belongs to book opamp for every one .
in chapter 16 of the book-filter design chapter-sensitivity is explained.
for a tolerance in a 8 order low pass butterworth filter, the difference between ideal response and real response is 0.35dB .
then in the book is written:
If this filter is intended for a data acquisition application, it could be used at best in a 4-bit
system. In comparison, if the maximum full-scale error of a 12-bit system is given with 1/2
LSB, then maximum pass-band deviation would be – 0.001 dB, or 0.012%
can you explain about these 4 bit and -0.001 dB?
how is reached to 4-bit from .35 db error?
thanks
 

Attachments

  • filterdesign.pdf
    292.8 KB · Views: 19

danadakk

Advanced Member level 5
Joined
Mar 26, 2018
Messages
1,747
Helped
283
Reputation
580
Reaction score
373
Trophy points
83
Activity points
7,943
Above 16-51 pic discussed is 4.1% G error. 4 bits = 6.25% = 1 LSB error which is the closest bit

count to cover the 4.1% error.

12 bits to 1/2 LSB, then G = 1 + 1 / 2**13 = 1.000122 = .0122% G error = + .001 db error


Regards, Dana.
 
Last edited:

FvM

Super Moderator
Staff member
Joined
Jan 22, 2008
Messages
50,032
Helped
14,496
Reputation
29,262
Reaction score
13,430
Trophy points
1,393
Location
Bochum, Germany
Activity points
287,139
The calculation is simple, but as I think inappropriate for a typical data acquisition application. You'll expect full resolution at DC or low to mid frequency but not necessarily near the cut-off frequency.
 

danadakk

Advanced Member level 5
Joined
Mar 26, 2018
Messages
1,747
Helped
283
Reputation
580
Reaction score
373
Trophy points
83
Activity points
7,943
I think of a true RMS meter, the high precision stuff HP/Agilent or Fluke
make. They would spec out to a BW, so to FVMs point that probably not the
actual 3 db BW but rather one that is << less to insure, in this case, no peaking
errors occur.

But these days high precision is done thru linearization and cal, a typical system
at manufacture looks like this process -

1653228532911.png



Regards, Dana.
 

LaTeX Commands Quick-Menu:

Part and Inventory Search

Welcome to EDABoard.com

Sponsor

Top