Continue to Site

Welcome to EDAboard.com

Welcome to our site! EDAboard.com is an international Electronics Discussion Forum focused on EDA software, circuits, schematics, books, theory, papers, asic, pld, 8051, DSP, Network, RF, Analog Design, PCB, Service Manuals... and a whole lot more! To participate you need to register. Registration is free. Click here to register now.

Scattering matrices being used incorrectly

Status
Not open for further replies.

rrumpf

Full Member level 5
Full Member level 5
Joined
Jul 6, 2007
Messages
294
Helped
66
Reputation
132
Reaction score
43
Trophy points
1,308
Location
El Paso, TX
Visit site
Activity points
3,624
We found that the vast majority of the literature using scattering matrices in semi-analytical methods (i.e. method of lines, rigorous coupled-wave analysis, eigen-mode expansion, mode matching, etc.) are defining the four terms S11, S12, S21, and S22 incorrectly. It has been convention for many decades that S11 is reflection and S21 is transmission, yet most of these papers use S11 as transmission and S21 as a reflection quantity. Why perfectly correct mathematically, it is very confusing and not consistent with convention.

We recently published a paper on this topic and also contributed some new concepts for implementing scattering matrices more easily and more efficiently. The paper is open access and freely available:

https://www.jpier.org/PIERB/pier.php?paper=11083107

Let me know your thoughts.
 

Status
Not open for further replies.

Part and Inventory Search

Welcome to EDABoard.com

Sponsor

Back
Top