Continue to Site

Welcome to EDAboard.com

Welcome to our site! EDAboard.com is an international Electronics Discussion Forum focused on EDA software, circuits, schematics, books, theory, papers, asic, pld, 8051, DSP, Network, RF, Analog Design, PCB, Service Manuals... and a whole lot more! To participate you need to register. Registration is free. Click here to register now.

resonant frequency and bandwith

Status
Not open for further replies.

chaitu_b99

Junior Member level 3
Joined
Mar 28, 2009
Messages
29
Helped
3
Reputation
6
Reaction score
3
Trophy points
1,283
Activity points
1,444
Hi,
Why we calculate the bandwidth and resonant frequency below the -10dB range in the S11 parameter chart.
 

This is just a definition, you may also define your bandwidth being as -20dB... no matter.
But the standard definition -3dB one as power.
 

Hi,
Why we calculate the bandwidth and resonant frequency below the -10dB range in the S11 parameter chart.

A return loss of 10 dB is considered acceptable for many applications. Specifying bandwidth where the return loss was 3 dB would generally not be a good idea, as such a return loss is unacceptable for most applications. Conversely, specifying bandwidth as the 30 dB return loss value would generally be a bad idea, as 30 dB is unnecarrily good for most applications.

What is an acceptable return loss depends on the application, but 10 dB is not an unreasonable number. Hence the reason its often specified.

Obviously for most resonate structures (e.g. antenna), the resonate frequency is important. One would be less interested in the resonate frequency of an attenuator, since that will be well outside the operating range of the device.
 

A return loss of 10 dB is considered acceptable for many applications. Specifying bandwidth where the return loss was 3 dB would generally not be a good idea, as such a return loss is unacceptable for most applications. Conversely, specifying bandwidth as the 30 dB return loss value would generally be a bad idea, as 30 dB is unnecarrily good for most applications.

What is an acceptable return loss depends on the application, but 10 dB is not an unreasonable number. Hence the reason its often specified.


Additon,-10dB return loss means 90% input power will be transferred to load which could be accepted by almost applications. Of course,you can say -10dB is habit value.
 

Additon,-10dB return loss means 90% input power will be transferred to load which could be accepted by almost applications. Of course,you can say -10dB is habit value.

Actually, a -10 dB return loss would mean the device is an amplifier such as an IMPATT diode, Gunn diode etc, returning 10x the input power.

Return loss should be a positive number of dB.

Dave
 
-10dB Return Loss (S11) came from the old antenna matching approach where the limit of the VSWR was 2:1
Return_Loss[dB] = -20*LOG[(VSWR-1)/(VSWR+1)].
That means 10% of the TX power is reflected back from the antenna, which most of the time is a maximum acceptable value for reflection.
 

Form what I read, return loss should be POSITIVE for passive antenna.
 

Status
Not open for further replies.

Part and Inventory Search

Welcome to EDABoard.com

Sponsor

Back
Top