Welcome to EDAboard.com

Welcome to our site! EDAboard.com is an international Electronic Discussion Forum focused on EDA software, circuits, schematics, books, theory, papers, asic, pld, 8051, DSP, Network, RF, Analog Design, PCB, Service Manuals... and a whole lot more! To participate you need to register. Registration is free. Click here to register now.

Register Log in

question about reflection coefficient in antenna

Status
Not open for further replies.

mehdi

Member level 1
Joined
Sep 29, 2003
Messages
38
Helped
3
Reputation
6
Reaction score
1
Trophy points
1,288
Activity points
255
reflection coefficient of antenna

hi
please answer me that a good antenna should have a large reflection coefficient or small one?
thanks in adv.
 

g86

Full Member level 4
Joined
Jan 21, 2003
Messages
212
Helped
11
Reputation
22
Reaction score
7
Trophy points
1,298
Location
On top of antenna :))
Activity points
2,232
reflection coefficient efficiency antenna

mehdi said:
hi
please answer me that a good antenna should have a large reflection coefficient or small one?
thanks in adv.
0 is the best. but sometimes we go for higher value to increase bandwidth or otimize pattern.
 

    mehdi

    points: 2
    Helpful Answer Positive Rating

vfone

Advanced Member level 5
Joined
Oct 10, 2001
Messages
5,146
Helped
1,526
Reputation
3,053
Reaction score
1,127
Trophy points
1,393
Activity points
32,562
Reflection coefficient Γ = (VSWR – 1) / (VSWR + 1)
Best antenna system efficiency: when is no reflection (VSWR = 1 resulting Γ = 0)
 

smallcat

Newbie level 4
Joined
Feb 19, 2006
Messages
6
Helped
0
Reputation
0
Reaction score
0
Trophy points
1,281
Activity points
1,330
The reflection coefficient is smaller, the more energy can flow into the antenna (transmitter).
 

sergio mariotti

Advanced Member level 1
Joined
Dec 22, 2003
Messages
468
Helped
69
Reputation
138
Reaction score
25
Trophy points
1,308
Location
Italy
Activity points
5,996
Hi,
I totally agree the preceding 3 answers , but I'would add a simple statement:
"The EM world is often very generous".

So means, for example, that a receive antenna will receive very well even if it is extremally mismatched.
 

jallem

Advanced Member level 1
Joined
Jul 23, 2005
Messages
452
Helped
72
Reputation
144
Reaction score
10
Trophy points
1,298
Activity points
4,998
I completed agree with Sergio. I found even for
return losses below 5 dB the antenna still work.
with a lot of inefficiency of course but works.
However, the antenna has to be resonant, otherwise
even with the best matching will not radiates. It looks
paradojic since one of the fundamental parameters
used for Ham radios guys( I was one of them) is the
VSWR, but happens that the ham radios always uses
known resonant antennas. For some arbitrary structures like
the one that can be build by HFSS or CST,etc the
"antenna" can have a better VSWR than a dipole
for example and still have a very bad radiation efficiency.
In other words the "antenna" accept a
good amount of energy buy it is not capable of
transform that in FAR FIELD energy, consequently
most of the energy is confined to near field, losses
due to dielectric, copper, etc. or split in LHP and RHP
 

Status
Not open for further replies.
Toggle Sidebar

Part and Inventory Search

Welcome to EDABoard.com

Sponsor

Top