Not so simple inductance measure

Status
Not open for further replies.

Vermes

Advanced Member level 4
Joined
Aug 2, 2011
Messages
1,163
Helped
0
Reputation
0
Reaction score
0
Trophy points
1,316
Activity points
22,318


This inductance meter can be useful when you work with pulse power supplies. The simplest solution is based on connecting a coil of not known inductance with a capacitor of known inductance. Negative resistance should be given to created resonant circuit and then frequency of oscillation should be measured.



This design uses stabilizer 78L05 and FET BF256.



C1 = 3,74nF

C1a = 3,74nF
C2 = C1 + C1a

The system was mounted on a piece of universal board using a kynar. It was a test before creating a device with AVR and LCD display.



1% precise capacitors were used in this design. When the circuit was tested using 5% inductances, there was a surprise, because the circuit should look like that:



Instead of that, it was:



Large parasitic capacity Cx appeared in the circuit.

10uH inductance is triggered at 713 kHz – so Cx=1,2nF
22uH inductance is triggered at 460 kHz – so Cx=1,62nF
10uH inductance is triggered at 306 kHz – so Cx=1,99nF

That means that the parasitic capacity is not constant.

That is why the measurement of inductance is done by connecting two capacitors of known capacities.




This allows to calculate the value of parasitic capacitor:



And when you know that value, you can calculate the inductance:



The second capacitor and button were soldered to the PCB. The following measurements used 10% inductances:



Link to original thread - (Nie tak) prosty pomiar indukcyjności!
 

The measurement accuracy can be improved by adjusting the oscillator current to the minimal value required for permanent oscillations. Simply place a variable resistor, preferably with log characteristic, e.g. 50 or 100 k in series with the 1 k resistor. The reported apparent "parasitic capcitance" should be considerably reduced. Reason for the inaccuracy is circuit overload by too strong feedback.
 

Status
Not open for further replies.

Similar threads

Cookies are required to use this site. You must accept them to continue using the site. Learn more…