ysba
Advanced Member level 4
- Joined
- May 26, 2013
- Messages
- 108
- Helped
- 23
- Reputation
- 46
- Reaction score
- 23
- Trophy points
- 1,298
- Activity points
- 2,136
Hi,
Has anyone used a non-dissipative clamp for flyback converters? I'm using a circuit like this, but I found few information about how many turns must be placed in the snubber winding. I saw only a piece of a text, saying that it must have the same number turns of primary winding.
I mounted the circuit, and it clamps the votlage spike, but I'd like to reduce its value yet more. My question is if I get a better result changing the number of snubber winding turns.
Also, I figured in practice that the value of the first VDS spike at mosfet's turn-off is strongly influenced by snubber's diode recover time. Putting in values, the input voltage plus the secondary reflected voltage is 150V. Using this non-dissipative snubber, the spike reaches 200V. I'd like to know if this value would be less using a better diode. Now I'm using a MURA120, with 35ns recovering time.
Thanks.
Has anyone used a non-dissipative clamp for flyback converters? I'm using a circuit like this, but I found few information about how many turns must be placed in the snubber winding. I saw only a piece of a text, saying that it must have the same number turns of primary winding.
I mounted the circuit, and it clamps the votlage spike, but I'd like to reduce its value yet more. My question is if I get a better result changing the number of snubber winding turns.
Also, I figured in practice that the value of the first VDS spike at mosfet's turn-off is strongly influenced by snubber's diode recover time. Putting in values, the input voltage plus the secondary reflected voltage is 150V. Using this non-dissipative snubber, the spike reaches 200V. I'd like to know if this value would be less using a better diode. Now I'm using a MURA120, with 35ns recovering time.
Thanks.