Continue to Site

Welcome to EDAboard.com

Welcome to our site! EDAboard.com is an international Electronics Discussion Forum focused on EDA software, circuits, schematics, books, theory, papers, asic, pld, 8051, DSP, Network, RF, Analog Design, PCB, Service Manuals... and a whole lot more! To participate you need to register. Registration is free. Click here to register now.

[SOLVED] [moved] Difference between Perfect E and Finite conductivity of materials in HFSS

Status
Not open for further replies.

sree479

Member level 2
Joined
Jul 29, 2014
Messages
42
Helped
4
Reputation
8
Reaction score
3
Trophy points
1,288
Location
nagpur
Activity points
1,527
Can anyone explain about the difference b/w Perfect E and Finite conductivity in HFSS.
When should use those perfect e and finite conductivity options for materials?

Thanks in advance for your help...
 

Where to use PEC
where to use Finite conductivity materials
 

If you don't care about field penetration into the conductor or resistive losses, it's better to use PEC for simplicity. HFSS treats the surfaces of PEC object as PEC boundaries so that there exist no electromagnetic field inside. You can define PEC boundary on 2D sheet objects to represent lossless conductors such as transmission line traces or patch antenna elements.
 

Status
Not open for further replies.

Part and Inventory Search

Welcome to EDABoard.com

Sponsor

Back
Top