Welcome to EDAboard.com

Welcome to our site! EDAboard.com is an international Electronics Discussion Forum focused on EDA software, circuits, schematics, books, theory, papers, asic, pld, 8051, DSP, Network, RF, Analog Design, PCB, Service Manuals... and a whole lot more! To participate you need to register. Registration is free. Click here to register now.

LPF in PLL -- Reasons explored??

Status
Not open for further replies.

gayu

Junior Member level 3
Joined
Aug 9, 2005
Messages
30
Helped
1
Reputation
2
Reaction score
0
Trophy points
1,286
Location
Florida, US
Activity points
1,562
Actually if we use a phase detector in the PLL, then we use LPF only to cut the transients that comes out from the detector along with a DC voltage that denotes the phase error.Because only when the control voltage to the VCO is stable, it can work properly.

If we make use of a Frequency detector instead of Phase detector, what would be the reason for using the LPF.

GD
 

MSGHP

Junior Member level 1
Joined
Jan 16, 2006
Messages
15
Helped
2
Reputation
4
Reaction score
0
Trophy points
1,281
Location
Iran
Activity points
1,409
in fact a frequency detector multiplies its input. therefor in the out put we have 2 terms with 2 different frequencies f1+f2 and f1-f2 where f1 and f2 are the frequencies of input signals of detector. the LPF elleminates the term of f1+f2 frequency.
 

snowball

Newbie level 3
Joined
Jan 25, 2006
Messages
4
Helped
0
Reputation
0
Reaction score
0
Trophy points
1,281
Activity points
1,328
There will be poles in all systems. You always need to consider about stability when you have a feedback loop. Without the LPF, you will have parasitics that dominates your frequency responses. Since the parasitics are not controlled, your frequency response of the PLL will be hard to determine. Therefore, a LPF defines the dominate pole, and therefore, help preventing oscillations.
 

gayu

Junior Member level 3
Joined
Aug 9, 2005
Messages
30
Helped
1
Reputation
2
Reaction score
0
Trophy points
1,286
Location
Florida, US
Activity points
1,562
MSGHP,

Thats right. I accept. But I have one more question. According to this concept of using LPF to cut the component f1+f2, how can we justify the use of PLL as frequency multiplier. That is...Let us assume that locking to f1 is done. Now at the feedback we divide it by 2( to have 2*f1 at the output). Now what happens before LPF.. We have f1/2 and 3*f1/2 ..Right LPF allows f1/2.. Then what happens to the frequency multiplication..It behaves like a frequency division.Alas!!!

Please clarify..

GD
 

sundarmeenakshi

Full Member level 3
Joined
Dec 12, 2006
Messages
188
Helped
19
Reputation
38
Reaction score
2
Trophy points
1,298
Activity points
2,258
gayu said:
MSGHP,

Thats right. I accept. But I have one more question. According to this concept of using LPF to cut the component f1+f2, how can we justify the use of PLL as frequency multiplier. That is...Let us assume that locking to f1 is done. Now at the feedback we divide it by 2( to have 2*f1 at the output). Now what happens before LPF.. We have f1/2 and 3*f1/2 ..Right LPF allows f1/2.. Then what happens to the frequency multiplication..It behaves like a frequency division.Alas!!!

Please clarify..

GD
ref THIs lInK
 

Status
Not open for further replies.

Part and Inventory Search

Welcome to EDABoard.com

Sponsor

Top