Welcome to EDAboard.com

Welcome to our site! EDAboard.com is an international Electronic Discussion Forum focused on EDA software, circuits, schematics, books, theory, papers, asic, pld, 8051, DSP, Network, RF, Analog Design, PCB, Service Manuals... and a whole lot more! To participate you need to register. Registration is free. Click here to register now.

Lagging/Leading PF - Lagging/Leading Q - Positive/Negative Q

Status
Not open for further replies.

powersys

Advanced Member level 1
Joined
Nov 29, 2005
Messages
440
Helped
3
Reputation
6
Reaction score
2
Trophy points
1,298
Activity points
4,987
negative power factor

Could someone show me the relationship, if any, withing the following terms:

Lagging/Leading Power Factor (PF)
Lagging/Leading Reactive Power (Q)
Positive/Negative Reactive Power (Q)

Can I say that Lagging PF = Lagging Q = Positive Q?

Thanks.
 

smxx

Full Member level 4
Joined
Aug 18, 2005
Messages
194
Helped
25
Reputation
50
Reaction score
13
Trophy points
1,298
Location
iran(ahwaz)
Activity points
2,553
negative reactive power

hi
we have a traveling power (reactive) that it is saved in magnetic and electric fields .for a half of priod it saved in mag. field (L)and for next half priod is saved in elec. field (C). for a inductanc load (L) ,current is lagging from voltage .so we say a inductive load has lagging reactive power.for a Cap. load we say it has leading reactive power.
Negative Reactive Power (Q) used for generation of Reactive Power and positve for consumption.

Can I say that Lagging PF = Lagging Q = Positive Q?

Do you mean PF=Q ??
 

powersys

Advanced Member level 1
Joined
Nov 29, 2005
Messages
440
Helped
3
Reputation
6
Reaction score
2
Trophy points
1,298
Activity points
4,987
leading pf

smxx said:
hi
we have a traveling power (reactive) that it is saved in magnetic and electric fields .for a half of priod it saved in mag. field (L)and for next half priod is saved in elec. field (C). for a inductanc load (L) ,current is lagging from voltage .so we say a inductive load has lagging reactive power.for a Cap. load we say it has leading reactive power.
Negative Reactive Power (Q) used for generation of Reactive Power and positve for consumption.

Can I say that Lagging PF = Lagging Q = Positive Q?

Do you mean PF=Q ??
I mean "Lagging PF" = "Lagging Q" = "Positive Q", correct? Thanks.

I'm confused. Any problem with the following statements:
For a load of capacitor VAr is produced and considered negative or lagging as in Figure 3.10.
A capacitive load on the other hand will be represented by R-jX as shown in Figure 3.12 and hence produces lagging VArs.

Or, pls check my another thread here:
https://www.edaboard.com/viewtopic.php?t=148522
Please give me your advices.

3-2-8-Figures.gif
 

jonw0224

Full Member level 4
Joined
Nov 22, 2004
Messages
211
Helped
45
Reputation
90
Reaction score
14
Trophy points
1,298
Location
USA
Activity points
2,528
negative vars

hi

Here is the understanding I have:

Lagging power factor is where the current lags the voltage (current peak occurs after voltage peak). This occurs if the load is inductive. In this case, the load consumes VArs. The question is now, is this positive VArs or negative VArs. Regardless, you must supply VArs. Most people call this positive VArs or positive Q.

Therefore:

Lagging power factor <=> load consumes VArs <=> positive Q <=> inductive load

(I'm using <=> to denote an implication and an inverse implication. Basically, this is an equality)

Leading power factor is where the current leads the voltage (current peak occurs before voltage peak). This occurs if the load is capacitive. In this case, the load supplies VArs. Most people call this negative VArs or negative Q.

Therefore:

Leading power factor <=> load supplies VArs <=> negative Q <=> capacitive load

Remember, that leading and lagging is always measured using the voltage (or real power, which is in phase of the voltage). Therefore, negative Q is lagging the voltage and positive Q is leading the voltage. Using the convention, you should rewrite your implication to be:

Lagging PF = Leading Q = Positive Q

Also,

Leading PF = Lagging Q = Negative Q
 

jonw0224

Full Member level 4
Joined
Nov 22, 2004
Messages
211
Helped
45
Reputation
90
Reaction score
14
Trophy points
1,298
Location
USA
Activity points
2,528
lagging vars

Actually, thinking about this some more, when

Lagging PF then the VArs are lagging the P. Therefore, your statement is correct, but your text appears to be using the convention I mentioned in the post above. The book is backwards and bizarre, it confused me too. Sorry, but

Lagging PF = Lagging Q = Positive Q.

Everything else I said above is correct. I never really think in terms of leading of lagging Q, but rather leading and lagging current and the consuming or supplying of VArs.
 

powersys

Advanced Member level 1
Joined
Nov 29, 2005
Messages
440
Helped
3
Reputation
6
Reaction score
2
Trophy points
1,298
Activity points
4,987
pf lagging

I agree with u. The author of the text used kind of convention that confuses reader. Thanks for your explanation.


jonw0224 said:
Actually, thinking about this some more, when

Lagging PF then the VArs are lagging the P. Therefore, your statement is correct, but your text appears to be using the convention I mentioned in the post above. The book is backwards and bizarre, it confused me too. Sorry, but

Lagging PF = Lagging Q = Positive Q.

Everything else I said above is correct. I never really think in terms of leading of lagging Q, but rather leading and lagging current and the consuming or supplying of VArs.
 

smxx

Full Member level 4
Joined
Aug 18, 2005
Messages
194
Helped
25
Reputation
50
Reaction score
13
Trophy points
1,298
Location
iran(ahwaz)
Activity points
2,553
pf leading lagging

hi all
PF is a number between -1 and 1
and reactive power Q may have any value.
I don't understand this
Lagging PF = Lagging Q = Positive Q.

pls tell me.

for fully sine wave we have
V=Vm cos(Θ) where Θ=ωt
I=Im cos(Θ+Φ)
S=V*I=Vm *Im cos(Θ)* cos(Θ+Φ)=½ Vm *Im [cos(2Θ+Φ)+cos(Φ)]
S=[Vrms*Irms *cos(Φ)]+[Vrms*Irms*cos(2Θ+Φ)]=P+Q
Q=Vrms*Irms*cos(2Θ+Φ)
so freq of reactive power is 2Θ
Q=Vrms*Irms*cos(2Θ+Φ)=Vrms*Irms*[cos(2Θ)cos(Φ)-sin(2Θ)sin(Φ)]
for a period mean values for term cos(2Θ)cos(Φ) is 0 and for sin(2Θ)sin(Φ) is sin(Φ)
so the mean value for Q is :Qm=Vrms*Irms*sin(Φ)
this value is the Amplitude of a sine wave only.
for dynamic PFC we must design a filter to measuering real time reactive power .

thanks all
 

powersys

Advanced Member level 1
Joined
Nov 29, 2005
Messages
440
Helped
3
Reputation
6
Reaction score
2
Trophy points
1,298
Activity points
4,987
pf leading

Hello,

I thought cos(θ) = cos(-θ) ≡ "positive value". So, PF should be a number between 0 ~ 1. Pls correct me if I am wrong.

Sorry for my post that confusing u. Actually I tried to ask as follows:
Lagging PF ≡ Lagging Q ≡ Positive Q
... meaning if a device gives "lagging PF", can we say that the Q associated to the device is "lagging Q" and "positive Q"?

Thanks.


smxx said:
hi all
PF is a number between -1 and 1
and reactive power Q may have any value.
I don't understand this
Lagging PF = Lagging Q = Positive Q.

pls tell me.

for fully sine wave we have
V=Vm cos(Θ) where Θ=ωt
I=Im cos(Θ+Φ)
S=V*I=Vm *Im cos(Θ)* cos(Θ+Φ)=½ Vm *Im [cos(2Θ+Φ)+cos(Φ)]
S=[Vrms*Irms *cos(Φ)]+[Vrms*Irms*cos(2Θ+Φ)]=P+Q
Q=Vrms*Irms*cos(2Θ+Φ)
so freq of reactive power is 2Θ
Q=Vrms*Irms*cos(2Θ+Φ)=Vrms*Irms*[cos(2Θ)cos(Φ)-sin(2Θ)sin(Φ)]
for a period mean values for term cos(2Θ)cos(Φ) is 0 and for sin(2Θ)sin(Φ) is sin(Φ)
so the mean value for Q is :Qm=Vrms*Irms*sin(Φ)
this value is the Amplitude of a sine wave only.
for dynamic PFC we must design a filter to measuering real time reactive power .

thanks all
 

jonw0224

Full Member level 4
Joined
Nov 22, 2004
Messages
211
Helped
45
Reputation
90
Reaction score
14
Trophy points
1,298
Location
USA
Activity points
2,528
positive vars

Yes, pf is never negative. But you designate a "leading" power factor or a "lagging" power factor.

Maybe some people use a negative sign to denote leading?

We've been using equal signs for a "reversable implication". Basically, we've been saying A = B to mean that

A implies B and B implies A

It's a logical equality not a numeric equality. Sorry for the confusion.
 

Status
Not open for further replies.

Part and Inventory Search

Welcome to EDABoard.com

Sponsor

Top