Continue to Site

Welcome to EDAboard.com

Welcome to our site! EDAboard.com is an international Electronics Discussion Forum focused on EDA software, circuits, schematics, books, theory, papers, asic, pld, 8051, DSP, Network, RF, Analog Design, PCB, Service Manuals... and a whole lot more! To participate you need to register. Registration is free. Click here to register now.

Is PT/Formality is replacement of Gate Sim

Status
Not open for further replies.

spauls

Advanced Member level 2
Joined
Dec 17, 2002
Messages
524
Helped
26
Reputation
52
Reaction score
9
Trophy points
1,298
Activity points
3,355
Hello All,
I have one doubt,
Suppose your Timings are met in Prime time and design is passes in Formality ,
Then it is OK to do Gate Sims.
Please advice.
 

Of course it's OK to do post_sim.
In our company, only STA and Fv is passed,then we will do post_sim. And we will not spend too much in post_sim. But at present,post_sim is still a must process.
 

Yes, I also think post sim is very important,
because it can check whether the timing script is in mistake..
1) Pre layout (unit delay) is also important;
because sometimes, the formality can miss
some mismatch; I have meet this case for one time.

2) Post layout is to check whether the timing constraint s is put correctly.

So, also necessary...

What I think, do not rely on one tool...
The EDA vendor always say their tool is perect..
But when the problem generate, just hmmmmm....
Maybe after short time, one new version is there,
welcome to download...
 

hi, spauls

Formal and STA can't replace the gate simulation(pre-simulation and post-simulation).

1). Formal tools only check the function of the design. It compare design between the different levels, and don't care the timing.

2). STA tools will check the timing of path which we don't set "flase_path" on. Now in SOC design, there are many clock domains. STA normally can't check the path through different clock domains.

So we have to do dynamic simulation, gate simulation.

Good Luck
 

Now, we do not have simple way to check whether the sta constraints is correct. Post simulation is a safe method.
 

Gate-level Simulation is a must do .
some faults must be simulated to find.
Function correcty must be verified at gate-level just like at-speed test!
 

no, perhaps you should run a simple gate-sim to verify IO timing is ok!!



spauls said:
Hello All,
I have one doubt,
Suppose your Timings are met in Prime time and design is passes in Formality ,
Then it is OK to do Gate Sims.
Please advice.
 

Gate simulation is very important and can't be replaced by PT/FM.

Only if you can ensure your synthesis and STA scripts are correct. But this seldom happens.
 

If the design have only one clk, i think post-sim can be replaced by STA/FV.

am I right?
 

JesseKing said:
If the design have only one clk, i think post-sim can be replaced by STA/FV.

am I right?

No. I don't think the post-sim can be totally replaced by STA/FV even with only one clock.
 

Status
Not open for further replies.

Part and Inventory Search

Welcome to EDABoard.com

Sponsor

Back
Top