Continue to Site

Welcome to EDAboard.com

Welcome to our site! EDAboard.com is an international Electronics Discussion Forum focused on EDA software, circuits, schematics, books, theory, papers, asic, pld, 8051, DSP, Network, RF, Analog Design, PCB, Service Manuals... and a whole lot more! To participate you need to register. Registration is free. Click here to register now.

[SOLVED] How to determine the small-signal voltage gain of Common mode BJT amplifier?

Status
Not open for further replies.

Max_JVC

Newbie
Joined
Feb 4, 2021
Messages
3
Helped
0
Reputation
0
Reaction score
0
Trophy points
1
Activity points
35
Hello Guys.

I have tried to calculate the voltage gain of the following circuit without measuring, only with the values that I have of the components. There are some formulas in texts like Sedra and Boylestad, but they are nowhere near what I actually measure with the multimeter. The circuit is as follows:

CB_AMP.png



The expression for the calculation with load that appears in the mentioned texts is the following:

\[ A_{v_L}=\frac{V_o}{V_i}=-\frac{R_C//R_L}{r_e} \]


I hope you can help me greetings! (Sorry, my English is very poor!)
 
Last edited:

You didn't tell your calculation or measurement results, thus we can't see which are wrong. I can only guess that you probably don't know what re in the expression means and how it's determined. It's 1/gm and can be estimated with 26 mV/Ic at 25 °C.
 

Hi,

C2 polarity seems to be wrong.

There are some formulas in texts like Sedra and Boylestad, but they are nowhere near what I actually measure with the multimeter.
.. then it's a good idea to tell us
* the simulation results and the
* the measured results

And how you measured them.
AC measurement is not a simple as DC measurement. There are different AC measurement and calculation methods with different results.

Klaus
 
Last edited:

You didn't tell your calculation or measurement results, thus we can't see which are wrong. I can only guess that you probably don't know what re in the expression means and how it's determined. It's 1/gm and can be estimated with 26 mV/Ic at 25 °C.
Hello.
Simulation results:
IC=508mA; IE=518mA; IB=9.97mA
VCE=19.89V; VCB=-18.92V; VBE=0.97V
VRL(rms)=289.236mV

I know what is re in the expression.

Hi,

C2 polarity seems to be wrong.


.. then it's a good idea to tell us
* the simulation results and the
* the measured results

And how you measured them.
AC measurement is not a simple as DC measurement. There are different AC measurement and calculation methods with different results.

Klaus
Why is the C2 polarity wrong? The voltage at that point never reaches 0, it is always positive.

I did the measurements like this:

1620892705656.png


Oscilloscope shows:

1620892283932.png


Thanks!
 

I can only guess that you probably don't know what re in the expression
I did the calculation as follows:

\[ A_{v_L}=\frac{R_L//R_C}{r_e}=I_C\frac{R_L//R_C}{V_T}=508mA\cdot\frac{5\Omega}{26mV}=97.69 \hspace{2mm}V/V \]

According to measurements:

\[ A_{v_L}=\frac{289mV}{40mV}=7.25 \hspace{2mm}V/V \]

I increased the signal frequency and the capacitors value to mitigate the low frequency gain attenuation but the latter value goes up to 11 V/V hopefully.
 

You still didn't report the measured voltage gain.

I see now, that "what I actually measure with the multimeter" actually means simulation. A real 2N3904 wold immediately burn with about 10W power dissipation.

The circuit has several issues:
1. C2 capacitance is far to small, causing a large voltage drop
2. 2N3904 isn't suited for the intended current and power level. Emitter and base bulk resistance has a large contribution to effective re. Respectively the estimation 26 mV/Ic isn't applicable.

C2 polarity is still wrong (you may want to visualize the node voltages in your simulation), but that's irrelevant for the present discussion. Multisim doesn't care for capacitor polarity.
 

Hi,

C2 polarity is still wrong (you may want to visualize the node voltages in your simulation), but that's irrelevant for the present discussion. Multisim doesn't care for capacitor polarity.
The discussion is "measured results vs simualted results".

While the simulation does not care about capacitor polarity, in the real circuit a wrongly oriented capacitor may shift DC operating point of the BJT.... modifying the AC measurement results.

Why is the C2 polarity wrong? The voltage at that point never reaches 0, it is always positive.
You have a simulation tool, so use it.
A capacitor has two connections. There is no single "at that point". You always need to take both nodes into account.

So either directly measure the DC voltage across the capacitor....
or measure both nodes WRT GROUND and decide which is the more positive one. (It should be the one marked with a "+")

Klaus
 

Status
Not open for further replies.

Part and Inventory Search

Welcome to EDABoard.com

Sponsor

Back
Top