Continue to Site

Welcome to EDAboard.com

Welcome to our site! EDAboard.com is an international Electronics Discussion Forum focused on EDA software, circuits, schematics, books, theory, papers, asic, pld, 8051, DSP, Network, RF, Analog Design, PCB, Service Manuals... and a whole lot more! To participate you need to register. Registration is free. Click here to register now.

Help need to convert lumped element model LNA to using MLIN fabrication level.

Status
Not open for further replies.

btv_murthy

Full Member level 3
Full Member level 3
Joined
Nov 29, 2011
Messages
159
Helped
9
Reputation
18
Reaction score
9
Trophy points
1,298
Location
BANGALORE
www.edaboard.com
Activity points
2,719
Dear Sir,
I have designed low noise amplifier at 1.3GHz using lumped elements (example R,L,C). Now I have to go for fabrication for this designed low noise amplifier(LNA). Before going to fabrication, I need to convert lumped element model to MLIN fabrication model. I designed LNA using AWR microwaveoffice, am new to this conversion. Can you anybody help me , how to convert the lumped element model to MLIN (microstrip line) fabrication model. Below I have shown sample LNA model using lumped elements and desired MLIN fabrication model. First figure shows lumped element sample of LNA and next figure shows desire conversion of the MLIN fabrication.




 

You can convert the coils only to Microstrip Lines.Capacitors can not be converted,they would be used as are.
Consider a coil being as a short circuited Microstipline and calculate the length and width regarding to your substrate parameters.It's so straightforward..
 
BigBoss Sir,
I agree with you, we can convert inductor to equivelent MLIN. But I didn't understand, why they are connecting two MLINs between capacitors and resistors everywhere in VENDOR element model with two different MLINs.On what basis we can connect two MLINs and how to calculate their values. Is there any simple example for illustation of converting lumped element model to VENDOR element model . Do you have any pdf regarding on this topic , can you give it me.
 

You take the advice already given about the basic parts you need.

Then, you make the circuit again, using microstrip parts to include a short piece of line at the input up to the capacitor which is likely 50 Ohm. You place a MSUB element, and fill in the values concerning the substrate, like thickness and Er.

If the capacitor needs a footprint pad, place that, along with any step width change bits that are consequential.

Then, a length of strip up to the stub that is going to do the job of the inductor. You might possibly make it hang off the capacitor pad, but life is easier if all the lengths between lumped-components parts are not expected to be zero!

A MTEE part, or a MTEE$ if you want the "intelligent type that automatically inherits the widths of whatever it gets connected to. This connects your stub that replaces the inductor

There may be a need for more - like a thin high-inductance track arriving for bias, maybe even via a wound inductor and decoupling capacitor. Instead of direct shorting the end if the stub, you might use sideways placed capacitors to do the "shorting", so that you can sneak the DC bias up the stub instead of using another MTEE$ to get the bias onto the gate. You end up with a whole long chain of stuff in your schematic, both on input and output.

Then you simulate using the S-parameter model for your active device, paying attention to stability factor, and noise figure. Invoke the "tune" feature, and tweak or optimize to bring the physical design closer to your lumped-element target. You may find you revise some features of your design.

Consider feeding DC to the drain via at a inductor that has high impedance at 1.3GHz. If there has to be a resistor, it goes the other side of the inductor, and has a decoupling capacitor between. In a low-noise amplifier, you try and avoid coupling in noise from resistors. It is less serious on drain than on gate circuits , but if you want it good then at least put the resistors behind inductors.

One hopes the design is stable, meaning stable at frequencies way outside of the band you are interested in. ATF34143 still has substantial gain up to 6Ghz, and really very high gains below 1GHz, like at UHF, HF, and even DC. It could oscillate violently at audio frequencies. You may need some deliberate inductance in the source, and other feedback compromise tricks, to get it stable. The bad constraint here is how to do it without too much noise from resistors.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Part and Inventory Search

Welcome to EDABoard.com

Sponsor

Back
Top