Welcome to our site! EDAboard.com is an international Electronics Discussion Forum focused on EDA software, circuits, schematics, books, theory, papers, asic, pld, 8051, DSP, Network, RF, Analog Design, PCB, Service Manuals... and a whole lot more! To participate you need to register. Registration is free. Click here to register now.
As we know a transmission line can be modeled with series L (H/m) and shunt C (F/m) lump elements. And distributed shunt admittance is Y (S/m)= j*w*C (where w is angular frequency and C (F/m) is model lump element). And in a paper, the authors mention the above relation.
I only know the distributed capacitor model and epsilon have same unit (F/m).
I think it's always problematic to use a well-known formula sign like C or Y for a different quantity like characteristic or "distributed" capacitance. It would prefer a sign like δC or C'. But I see that some textbooks are using this ambiguous symbols.
Technically, the formula has the right unit. Presumed that ε really means permittivity and not a second equivocal quantity, there is a geometry factor linking ε and C'. In case of a coaxial line, you get
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.