horak
Newbie level 6
Dear RF and uWave friends,
I have following interesting problem with s. 8.71. When trying to use it in Win98, then there is not possible to modify any existing graph,when trying to do that everytime it gives a message "an analysis must be performed before..." although the analysis was just performed. In NT 4.0 this happens not everytime, but only sometimes. I have met some files in NT, where this error does not appears and in some it happens, so I think it is some attribute or similar saved with the graphs and making this error, or the machine from some to me unknown reason does not recognize that the analyzis was just performed. I have forgotten to add that this appears during linear analysis. The only way how this problem can get round is to open a new graph, make the desired selections and display it, but again without possibility to change it, the same error appears again.
Has anybody met with this "operating system" related problem with graphing and eventually found some solution to avoid that?
I will be happy to hear your opinion,
Best regards,
horak.
I have following interesting problem with s. 8.71. When trying to use it in Win98, then there is not possible to modify any existing graph,when trying to do that everytime it gives a message "an analysis must be performed before..." although the analysis was just performed. In NT 4.0 this happens not everytime, but only sometimes. I have met some files in NT, where this error does not appears and in some it happens, so I think it is some attribute or similar saved with the graphs and making this error, or the machine from some to me unknown reason does not recognize that the analyzis was just performed. I have forgotten to add that this appears during linear analysis. The only way how this problem can get round is to open a new graph, make the desired selections and display it, but again without possibility to change it, the same error appears again.
Has anybody met with this "operating system" related problem with graphing and eventually found some solution to avoid that?
I will be happy to hear your opinion,
Best regards,
horak.