Welcome to EDAboard.com

Welcome to our site! EDAboard.com is an international Electronic Discussion Forum focused on EDA software, circuits, schematics, books, theory, papers, asic, pld, 8051, DSP, Network, RF, Analog Design, PCB, Service Manuals... and a whole lot more! To participate you need to register. Registration is free. Click here to register now.

Register Log in

Discussion: Can EM simulator be used for Helical Antenna ?

Status
Not open for further replies.

Rayengine

Full Member level 5
Joined
May 18, 2001
Messages
287
Helped
3
Reputation
6
Reaction score
3
Trophy points
1,298
Location
Hong Kong
Activity points
1,737
cst helix antenna

Hi All,

Someone has told me that it is impossible to place the Helical Antenna for EM simulation because it is hard to model the helical structure. Is the statement true or not ?

Best Rgs
 

Kit-the-great

Full Member level 3
Joined
Mar 30, 2002
Messages
151
Helped
5
Reputation
10
Reaction score
3
Trophy points
1,298
Location
Russia
Activity points
1,317
plotting helix hfss

You can simulate the helical antenna by the NEC or SuperNEC software (anyway I have seen the corresponding SuperNEC example), but I don't know how it will be accurate.

With responce,
Kit-the-great
 

Rayengine

Full Member level 5
Joined
May 18, 2001
Messages
287
Helped
3
Reputation
6
Reaction score
3
Trophy points
1,298
Location
Hong Kong
Activity points
1,737
hfss draw helix greyed

But, how can we start if we have choosen some common ISM band frequency in US (900MHz, 1900MHz, 2.4GHz and 5.8GHz) ? Are there limitation on the spacing between each turns? Any valuable advise!
 

yuyu

Advanced Member level 4
Joined
Mar 27, 2002
Messages
108
Helped
13
Reputation
26
Reaction score
12
Trophy points
1,298
Activity points
1,018
cst microwave studio helical antenna

Hi Rayengine,

I know that helical antenna was simulated by CST MWS. In fact there is an example about that antenna in the installation CD. The conformal FDTD or FIT allows to simulate this kind of model.

Regards.
 

zorro

Advanced Member level 4
Joined
Sep 6, 2001
Messages
1,131
Helped
356
Reputation
710
Reaction score
298
Trophy points
1,363
Location
Argentina
Activity points
8,902
simulator .be

Hi Rayengine,

I\E3\D also has a helical antenna as an example.
The difficulty with many simulators is that they cannot manage curved structures. But curves and curved surfaces can be approximated with staight segments and pieces of planes. In the case of that example, the approximation is constructed with 12 segments per turn.
C\S\T claims to simulate very accurately curved structures without those approximations, but I have not experience with it.
Regards

Z
 

VSWR

Advanced Member level 3
Joined
Feb 7, 2002
Messages
749
Helped
103
Reputation
206
Reaction score
23
Trophy points
1,298
Activity points
5,425
how to draw helix in cst

I have simulated 2.4 GHz Helix antennas using CST MWS. The correlation with measurements was surprisingly good.
 

Rayengine

Full Member level 5
Joined
May 18, 2001
Messages
287
Helped
3
Reputation
6
Reaction score
3
Trophy points
1,298
Location
Hong Kong
Activity points
1,737
drawing helix in cst

GaAs FET said:
I have simulated 2.4 GHz Helix antennas using CST MWS. The correlation with measurements was surprisingly good.

GaAs FET
Hi GaAs FET,

Can you share with the forum with the design file on how it construct?
 

loucy

Advanced Member level 1
Joined
Aug 26, 2001
Messages
414
Helped
24
Reputation
48
Reaction score
11
Trophy points
1,298
Activity points
4,657
helix antenna cst

XFDTD also has an example project for helix antenna.
 

personal

Junior Member level 3
Joined
Nov 29, 2002
Messages
30
Helped
0
Reputation
0
Reaction score
0
Trophy points
1,286
Activity points
141
helix cst

you may like to use empire from umist.
 

mwpro

Member level 4
Joined
Apr 20, 2001
Messages
71
Helped
1
Reputation
2
Reaction score
1
Trophy points
1,288
Activity points
700
cst, helix

hfss can solve it.
 
  • Like
Reactions: long88

    long88

    points: 2
    Helpful Answer Positive Rating

toonafishy

Full Member level 6
Joined
Jun 18, 2002
Messages
369
Helped
38
Reputation
76
Reaction score
12
Trophy points
1,298
Location
Earth
Activity points
3,187
helical cst mws drawing

I agree, I use H/F/S/S for this problem. However, drawing the geometry is pretty difficult but the results are good.
 

loucy

Advanced Member level 1
Joined
Aug 26, 2001
Messages
414
Helped
24
Reputation
48
Reaction score
11
Trophy points
1,298
Activity points
4,657
helical antenna cst drawing

Is there a command for drawing Helix in Ansoft HFSS?

I remember Agilent HFSS has one.
 

goxy

Full Member level 4
Joined
Jul 25, 2002
Messages
234
Helped
6
Reputation
12
Reaction score
5
Trophy points
1,298
Activity points
2,282
helical..e/m ratio

In 4NEC2 you can find Helix antenna example.
 

shou

Member level 4
Joined
Sep 5, 2001
Messages
77
Helped
0
Reputation
0
Reaction score
0
Trophy points
1,286
Activity points
417
i think you can use 3d tool, such hf55
 

yingyang

Full Member level 2
Joined
Dec 26, 2002
Messages
126
Helped
2
Reputation
4
Reaction score
2
Trophy points
1,298
Activity points
862
helical antenna

You can if you are designing conformal 3d helical antenna...
 

yingyang

Full Member level 2
Joined
Dec 26, 2002
Messages
126
Helped
2
Reputation
4
Reaction score
2
Trophy points
1,298
Activity points
862
solver

You can also solve with winnec...
 

aw

Member level 3
Joined
Jun 9, 2001
Messages
54
Helped
5
Reputation
10
Reaction score
3
Trophy points
1,288
Activity points
333
easy with CST - geometry takes only a few minutes...
 

filterman

Member level 2
Joined
Jan 18, 2002
Messages
52
Helped
1
Reputation
2
Reaction score
1
Trophy points
1,288
Activity points
512
I atended a seminar organized by CST, where they presented their softwares, now I have collegues that use CST and have good results, but I know other engineers that use IMST,QWED or Fidelity and they also get excellent results.
Now I listened quite carefully to CST presentation and they convinced me that they use precise geometrys like the real model they try to simulate(compared to stairbox case), but what they did is render a perfect geometry and move the aproximation to the electromagnetic simulator calculation.
So when using a staircase simulator the simulation is precise, but the geometry tries to aproximate the reality-so results are a aproximation,
CST removed the aproximation from the geometry and transfered it to the simulation itself.
The results are pretty good for a good operator, but other simulators will get you similar results, some maybe more precise. But we are engineers so we need enough precision to do our design and can leave absolute precision to pure academics.
CST for sure have for the time being the best modeller, but this is changing fast in this competitive market.
 

loucy

Advanced Member level 1
Joined
Aug 26, 2001
Messages
414
Helped
24
Reputation
48
Reaction score
11
Trophy points
1,298
Activity points
4,657
Rendering a perfect geometry makes the user feel better, but the result is by no means better.

If staircasing is used, much resource is needed for simulating curved objects. The internal of MWStudio is certainly more complicated.

I read from this forum that CST is keeping its PBA "perfect boundary approximation" algorithm secret. The user would have no way to finding out the disadvantages. This would eventually hurt the product.

The meaning of "enough precision" is never precise. Years ago a pocket calculator was good enough.
 

Status
Not open for further replies.
Toggle Sidebar

Part and Inventory Search

Welcome to EDABoard.com

Sponsor

Top