Welcome to EDAboard.com

Welcome to our site! EDAboard.com is an international Electronic Discussion Forum focused on EDA software, circuits, schematics, books, theory, papers, asic, pld, 8051, DSP, Network, RF, Analog Design, PCB, Service Manuals... and a whole lot more! To participate you need to register. Registration is free. Click here to register now.

Register Log in

CST and HFSS, which is better for metamaterial simulations

Status
Not open for further replies.

qqqooo

Junior Member level 1
Joined
Oct 6, 2006
Messages
18
Helped
0
Reputation
0
Reaction score
0
Trophy points
1,281
Activity points
1,382
metamaterials simulation cst

Hi,
Any Guys can give some suggestion , CST and HFSS which is better for simulation of metamaterials.

Thanks very much.

Added after 1 minutes:

As well as how about COMSOL?
 

snkhan

Full Member level 6
Joined
Oct 19, 2005
Messages
324
Helped
38
Reputation
74
Reaction score
20
Trophy points
1,298
Location
Gods place
Activity points
3,213
comsol metamaterial

Hi
If u just talk about the accuracy of the results, then except mos tof the research groups are using

1) HFSS (Accurate but tooo slow used by itol and many other groups)
2) COMSOL (Accurate and used especially for cloaking currenlty all papers by smith group are using COMSOL). In my opinion COMSOL is going to overcome metamaterial simulation market due to its enhaced functionality but difficult to start with
3) CST (good enough used by Jiu A KONG
 

loucy

Advanced Member level 1
Joined
Aug 26, 2001
Messages
414
Helped
24
Reputation
48
Reaction score
11
Trophy points
1,298
Activity points
4,657
hfss metamaterial

I don't think Jin A. Kong would run the simulation himself. Even if he does so, that doesn't mean CST is "Good Enough". These professors might know a lot about metamaterial, but...
 

snkhan

Full Member level 6
Joined
Oct 19, 2005
Messages
324
Helped
38
Reputation
74
Reaction score
20
Trophy points
1,298
Location
Gods place
Activity points
3,213
Re: CST and HFSS, which is better for metamaterial simulatio

loucy said:
I don't think Jin A. Kong would run the simulation himself. Even if he does so, that doesn't mean CST is "Good Enough". These professors might know a lot about metamaterial, but...
Dear loucy

I did not mean like and sorry if it mislead any body. What i meant to say is differnt research groups are using differnts software as mention in case of smith and itol (accodring to the paper that i read) and i am quite sure they also never used them but they are big in the area. Well kong is big man smith and itol has much contirubiton regarding the metamaterials

Regards
 

Status
Not open for further replies.
Toggle Sidebar

Part and Inventory Search

Welcome to EDABoard.com

Sponsor

Top